Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.212]) by air-me10.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME101-8bc44ca13886316; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:36:22 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EB9003800050A; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:36:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P0O9m-0000LI-HP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:34:54 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P0O9c-0000L6-36 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:34:44 +0100 Received: from mail-qw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P0O9b-0007ZW-2x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:34:45 +0100 Received: by qwj8 with SMTP id 8so4475622qwj.16 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:34:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9IhsGHIee+GkQiCjRz58MmztM2PlrRIqLd0fZdIyN88=; b=q+H2pX5VWjccfIOC0ciZGHEtgNjQs0KwYVz9pOgsi6+drB5MEbWMx52yd2lo2XeGVp gTOvfVujj2DmJ5OMccSzHvc0wYY8Wg97X/r6bnwKbpidKuo/yQW4sJdJaLza+AVDOmZg fR9B5nLBWUIH5TQf0LpQ8DKyE+DtFjgIYhU4Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TfYgT3ELWMbHirmnxCZI3NQjPA37eFRMZmYXd1BLLryjkZCQMc2SsqedA82zShDVp2 6jsj3Lxp9sVlhacpQjiTfRQGqesMBNpzuFNVViyzYynft6XVETKI9pOkt80wAY8KVA1W v7ZLCI7hsC71DoEfEXkqhuozpmAog4aYzvTSM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.69.162 with SMTP id z34mr6237387qai.38.1285634076374; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:34:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.217.77 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:34:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20100927193758.03c48ea8@erols.com> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20100927193758.03c48ea8@erols.com> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:34:36 -0400 Message-ID: From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: Earth Antennas Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64ddeba6efd160491470243 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m271.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d44ca138847573 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0016e64ddeba6efd160491470243 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sandy, These results are not very impressive! I have done much better than that with either a top loaded 80' vertical or a transmit loop! Also, it is hard to see how an LF antenna could favor skywave over groundwave! -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Nan and Sandy Sanders wrote: > Hi all. About 8 or 9 years ago AMRAD installed what we called an earth > bipole. From our web page http://www.amrad.org/projects/lf/ > > "AMRAD has built a 1500 foot long bipole antenna. This is a wire that goes > through the woods and is connected on one end to a 300 foot steel well > casing and a ground rod in lake on the other. It is tuned to resonance with > two large coils near the ends and a ferrite toroid transformer gets it all > to 50 ohms for the transmitter. Initially it was not strong back here in the > Washington DC area. But now it looks like the signal is pretty good further > out. It may favor sky wave to ground wave. Recent results have been good > with reception into London, Ontario Canada by Mitch Powell VE3OT. His zipped > .wav file can be downloaded here. > Note that it is almost 750k. This reception is about 324 miles or 521 km. > Closer in we have reception confirmed from Steve Dove W3EEE/G3YDV at Mt. > Gretna PA. " > Note: here= http://www.amrad.org/projects/lf/wa2.zip > > The wire was attached to trees about 15 feet off the ground and it was fed > about 100w and keyed at 5 wpm. We always had problems getting people to > listen for us outside the local area. We lost interest after our FCC would > not give us 137Khz as an amateur band. > One thing I learned during the installation of this antenna is that if you > step into waist deep mud and cannot get your self out, your fellow amateurs > will laugh and take photos of you before they will help you get out. > I think that AMRADs and Stefan's experience show that this type of antenna > is worth some investigation. > Sandy > WB5MMB > > --0016e64ddeba6efd160491470243 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sandy,
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0These results are not very impressive!
= I have done much better than that with either a top loaded 80' vertica= l or a transmit loop!

=A0Also, it is hard to see= how an LF antenna could favor skywave over groundwave!=A0


--=A0
73 Warren K2ORS
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XGJ=A0
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23
=A0= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XEB/2
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= WE2XGR/1


On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Nan= and Sandy Sanders <radiodog77@pobox.com> wrote:
Hi all. About 8 or 9 years ago AMRAD installed what we called an earth bip= ole. From our web page http://www.amrad.org/projects/lf/

"AMRAD has built a 1500 foot long bipole antenna. This is a wire that= goes through the woods and is connected on one end to a 300 foot steel we= ll casing and a ground rod in lake on the other. It is tuned to resonance= with two large coils near the ends and a ferrite toroid transformer gets= it all to 50 ohms for the transmitter. Initially it was not strong back= here in the Washington DC area. But now it looks like the signal is prett= y good further out. It may favor sky wave to ground wave. Recent results= have been good with reception into London, Ontario Canada by Mitch Powell= VE3OT. His zipped .wav file can be downloaded <http://www.amrad.org/proje= cts/lf/wa2.zip>here. Note that it is almost 750k. This reception is= about 324 miles or 521 km. Closer in we have reception confirmed from Ste= ve Dove W3EEE/G3YDV at Mt. Gretna PA. "
Note: =A0here=3D http://www.amrad.org/projects/lf/wa2.zip

The wire was attached to trees about 15 feet off the ground and it was fed= about 100w and keyed at 5 wpm. We always had problems getting people to= listen for us outside the local area. We lost interest after our FCC woul= d not give us 137Khz as an amateur band.
One thing I learned during the installation of this antenna is that if you= step into waist deep mud and cannot get your self out, your fellow amateu= rs will laugh and take photos of you before they will help you get out. I think that AMRADs and Stefan's experience show that this type of ant= enna is worth some investigation.
=A0 =A0 Sandy
=A0 =A0 WB5MMB





=A0
--0016e64ddeba6efd160491470243--