DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=NO26zfbAxgpzppEG4pPj8esEjCudhd9C1BJfHI809twcdVOalSMeAuL3hqPFY8cSOF
         lKvUMnyEBb0Kx9buNUYNbaZ/vHF8cp0JdMzJoz4VV11KO0r5mQsZrZNlOYPib8/ekMEq
         JuraEODY4YMok3jRgNoBUXjI74Bv62cUnC4ew=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinUeSSpzAgBSN_xkbvBbGYBpCfj6y8jn=OOHmoy@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinUeSSpzAgBSN_xkbvBbGYBpCfj6y8jn=OOHmoy@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:31:32 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=k7f9XUe14i99JfjG+W7dpwr57hNaR73uZrthA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: G4JNT 503kHz Beacon
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cadb62d92260490799cae
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--0015175cadb62d92260490799cae
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'd appreciate a 137kHz WSPR beacon Andy.  500kHz too if both possible.

73s
Roger

On 17 September 2010 19:27, Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Is there likely to be much interest in my 503kHz beacon or is it worth
> looking at replacing it with a 137kHz WSPR one?    Its been mostly off air
> for a couple of weeks while the antenna was rebuilt as a dual purpose fat HF
> dipole / top loaded Tee - and I still haven't got round to optimising the
> pre-matching for the HF bit yet.
>
> However, it does now resonate  at 503 and 137kHz and its tempting to put a
> low duty cycle WSPR signal on over the winter period using the 700 Watt
> switchmode PA which has been sitting idle for a few years now.  However,  a
> new lower power beacon Tx may be more acceptable - especially to my
> electricity bill.
>
> Andy
> www.g4jnt.com
>



-- 
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088

--0015175cadb62d92260490799cae
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I&#39;d appreciate a 137kHz WSPR beacon Andy.=A0 500kHz too if both possib=
le.<br><br>73s<br>Roger<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 17 September=
 2010 19:27, Andy Talbot <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:andy.g4jn=
t@googlemail.com">andy.g4jnt@googlemail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; bord=
er-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div>Is there=
 likely to be much interest in my 503kHz beacon or is it worth looking at=
 replacing it with a 137kHz WSPR one?=A0=A0=A0 Its been mostly off air for=
 a couple of weeks while the antenna was rebuilt as a dual purpose fat HF=
 dipole / top loaded Tee - and I still haven&#39;t got round to optimising=
 the pre-matching=A0for the HF bit yet.</div>


<div>=A0</div>
<div>However, it does now=A0resonate =A0at 503 and 137kHz and its tempting=
 to put a low duty cycle WSPR signal=A0on over the winter period=A0using=
 the 700 Watt switchmode PA which has been sitting idle for a few years no=
w.=A0 However,=A0 a new lower power=A0beacon Tx=A0may be more acceptable=
 - especially to my electricity bill.</div>


<div><br clear=3D"all">Andy<br><a href=3D"http://www.g4jnt.com" target=3D"=
_blank">www.g4jnt.com</a><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><a href=3D"http://g3xb=
m-qrp.blogspot.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/</a><=
br><a href=3D"http://www.g3xbm.co.uk" target=3D"_blank">http://www.g3xbm.c=
o.uk</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm" target=3D"_blank">http://www=
.youtube.com/user/g3xbm</a><br>G3XBM=A0=A0 GQRP 1678=A0=A0=A0 ISWL G11088<=
br>

--0015175cadb62d92260490799cae--