Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dj07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dj07.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.19.187.143]) by air-dc07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC071-86034c88cee7e1; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:11:19 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (unknown [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dj07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2DEDF380000B8; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:11:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OtfxC-000214-Bl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:10:10 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OtfxB-00020v-OD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:10:09 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Otfx7-0006rc-71 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:10:10 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o89C9Zgq024753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:09:36 +0200 Received: from [129.206.29.99] (pc99.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.99]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id o89CA4Oi001343 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:10:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4C88CE2E.5010903@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:08:14 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4C86A8C8.506@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <006101cb5009$8ca2ac30$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> In-Reply-To: <006101cb5009$8ca2ac30$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC.. on air_TNX! Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030809070704030508010209" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039cdbc9d0c4c88cee518f6 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------030809070704030508010209 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Jay, Thanks for the info. I am glad too! :-) My antenna was the 100m kite vertical that was just in an angle of 45 deg, due to the poor wind. Thus, the radiation resistance was just about 410 mOhm. The losses in the system have been about 50 Ohm (on my /p QTH in Germany i can reach about 30 Ohm) and my power is per definition 1 W ERP, as allowed in most EU countries. So my TX power must have been 37 W, out of the 1 kW class E PA (operating voltage reduced)... A picture of me and the PA (without power supply) during the demonstration of my setup in France can be found at http://www.f42.info/ (scroll down to the center of the page). 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: The screenshot looked like taken with SpecLab that has a Spectrum display, just as on my grabber sites. Thus i thought you could have more infos, but no problem... Am 09.09.2010 12:27, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > Stephan > Glad to receive your signal! > The capture was made in QRSS60. While I don't have a s/n measurement, > It would have been an easy QRSS30 reception and a bit more difficult > at QRSS10. Recption condx here are still with much QRN. In mid winter > that would have been easy QRSS10 and possibly even usable QRSS3. > Missed the description of your TX setup. Any info would be appreciated. > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > --------------030809070704030508010209 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Jay,

Thanks for the info. I am glad too! :-)

My antenna was the 100m kite vertical that was just in an angle of 45 deg, due to the poor wind. Thus, the radiation resistance was just about 410 mOhm. The losses in the system have been about 50 Ohm (on my /p QTH in Germany i can reach about 30 Ohm) and my power is per definition 1 W ERP, as allowed in most EU countries. So my TX power must have been 37 W, out of the 1 kW class E PA (operating voltage reduced)...
A picture of me and the PA (without power supply) during the demonstration of my setup in France can be found at http://www.f42.info/ (scroll down to the center of the page).

73, Stefan/DK7FC

PS: The screenshot looked like taken with SpecLab that has a Spectrum display, just as on my grabber sites. Thus i thought you could have more infos, but no problem...


Am 09.09.2010 12:27, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net:
Stephan
 
Glad to receive your signal!
 
The capture was made in QRSS60. While I don't have a s/n measurement, It would have been an easy QRSS30 reception and a bit more difficult at QRSS10. Recption condx here are still with much QRN. In mid winter that would have been easy QRSS10 and possibly even usable QRSS3.
 
Missed the description of your TX setup. Any info would be appreciated.
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2
 

--------------030809070704030508010209--