Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.18]) by air-dd06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD061-860c4c888fe5309; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:42:29 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-ma10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E836838000084; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 03:42:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Otbl9-0007yx-AH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:41:27 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Otbl8-0007yo-S5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:41:26 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Otbl4-00040I-07 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:41:27 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o897fFAh021693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:41:15 +0200 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o897fKFs032325 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:41:21 +0200 Received: from [129.206.196.105] (vpn105a.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.196.105]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o897eqlK025872 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:40:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4C888FAB.1080906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:41:31 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4C882E89.6080104@telus.net> <4C88412B.4030307@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <4C88412B.4030307@telus.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: TIL bumping up the power... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030900020008010607030906" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60124c888fe35c2f X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------030900020008010607030906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Scott, With some imagination one can see a trace on my LD_DX grabber in the QRSS-120 window (http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html) arround 4 UTC at 137.778 kHz (still visible there). If the QRN would be 3 dB lower or propagation or your signal would be 3 dB better, it would be rather clear if it's your trace. I hope for the winther and some improvements on my side ;-) 73, GL, Stefan Am 09.09.2010 04:06, schrieb Scott Tilley: > Thanks Warren > > Oppps! So use to living in the milli world! > > Scott > > > > > On 9/9/2010 1:11 AM, Warren Ziegler wrote: >> Scott, >> Surely you mean a conservative 0.5 W rather than 0.5 mW ! >> -- >> 73 Warren K2ORS >> WD2XGJ >> WD2XSH/23 >> WE2XEB/2 >> WE2XGR/1 >> >> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Scott Tilley > > wrote: >> >> I'm going to bump up the juice from 400W to 1.1KW (MOALFA Stun >> mode) tonight. +4dB. >> >> 137778.0 +0.25Hz DAH, DFCW120, my sunset to sunrise. >> >> According to the my most conservative calculations that will be >> about 0.5mW ERP >> >> I may revert back to 400W if I have any sign of trouble. >> >> 73 Scott >> VE7TIL CN89dk >> http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------030900020008010607030906 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Scott,

With some imagination one can see a trace on my LD_DX grabber in the QRSS-120 window (http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html) arround 4 UTC at 137.778 kHz (still visible there). If the QRN would be 3 dB lower or propagation or your signal would be 3 dB better, it would be rather clear if it's your trace. I hope for the winther and some improvements on my side ;-)

73, GL, Stefan



Am 09.09.2010 04:06, schrieb Scott Tilley:
Thanks Warren

Oppps!  So use to living in the milli world!

Scott




On 9/9/2010 1:11 AM, Warren Ziegler wrote:
Scott,
    
   Surely you mean a conservative 0.5 W rather than 0.5 mW !
-- 
73 Warren K2ORS
                WD2XGJ 
                WD2XSH/23
                WE2XEB/2
                WE2XGR/1

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Scott Tilley <sthed475@telus.net> wrote:
 I'm going to bump up the juice from 400W to 1.1KW (MOALFA Stun mode) tonight.  +4dB.

137778.0 +0.25Hz DAH, DFCW120, my sunset to sunrise.

According to the my most conservative calculations that will be about 0.5mW ERP

I may revert back to 400W if I have any sign of trouble.

73 Scott
VE7TIL CN89dk
http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/








 
--------------030900020008010607030906--