Return-Path: Received: from mtain-di09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-di09.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.13]) by air-di07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDI072-eacf4c65639d215; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:24:13 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-di09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A3C0738000092; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:24:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ojw6K-00034p-T7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:23:20 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ojw6K-00034e-Ci for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:23:20 +0100 Received: from mail-vw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.212.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ojw6I-0000rC-Qm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:23:20 +0100 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so1463313vws.16 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g6A8wyQMeYZnJFAz+yk9A8GwzrZRFwBGMkTTkKNk18w=; b=YfJ3zYInh69cs2AI5vTpg1pDvVwv96kBLOWECtNFL7QhgQBIaiL0CrbhRodmYLIVSB VAWneFVt5k1V8TA5Th+fFfI+eIiOTW0lvdTjA8GvetPZW4t2Dcl+CZSpKb+S3pTvFwuH wMU96C/RBAbkwrwFXuqv9UzESTyq86jAlLjno= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bSuoFPQbbF05DPE3FFmDUTs3y3eWhl4h14wsLQAbAe/mFC+LZSCamCw0Y2HhEFhwBl fxQrmAQCf4aSM0akYaf8tzrEBwxpiK1FSEDahlSO70gnhbKAAWlKT8qLMvSEjJT7GdCR q4y4mTxoRYRev2xZzr08JjJ5YCJjOqRpg53Ws= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.245.1 with SMTP id ls1mr1365425qcb.112.1281712991994; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.129.138 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:23:11 -0400 Message-ID: From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: A question about loops for 136 and 500kHz TX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b8b889785a0048db60f15 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m219.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d400d4c65639a07c6 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0016363b8b889785a0048db60f15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Roger, Running the conductor along the ground will increase ground losses. The late Reg Edwards G4FGQ had a program for calculating loops - Rjeloop or some such, you could see the losses go up and the radiated power go down as the bottom of the loop got closer to the ground. Reg's Rjeloop program was calibrated to some unspecified ground condition - I found that my losses were less than his program predicted, but I believe that the trend for higher losses at lower elevations was correct. If you are running high power there will be considerable voltages from conductor to ground - I have a problem when its raining with the insulation breaking down and catching vegetation on fire. (My loop conductors are RG-11 and RG214 coax). I try to space the cable as far away as possible from trees, leaves etc and run high power (> 1kW) in dry weather which seems to be enough to prevent insulation breakdown. -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Having considered the antenna options for my small garden, I'm going to > erect a TX loop antenna rather than a Marconi vertical for 136kHz: the > earthing issues are removed and it is easier to build a capacitor selection > box (to tune and match the loop) than wind a huge loading coil and match it. > I've seen some of the webpages dealing with these and understand basically > what is needed (large loop area, thick wire, capacitor match-box, dealing > with high RF currents, etc). I understand the loop will have directionality > and nulls. > > My question is this. *Is there any reason why the bottom of the loop > cannot be laid along the ground rather than elevated a few metres?* Most > designs show the bottom elevated a bit, but if laid on the soil I could use > thick coax or multiple wires for part of the loop so reducing the loop > resistance. > > Views appreciated, although it may be a case of "suck it and see". > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 > --0016363b8b889785a0048db60f15 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roger,

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Running the conductor along the ground= will increase ground losses.
The late Reg Edwards G4FGQ had a program= for calculating loops - Rjeloop or some such, you could see the losses go= up and the radiated power go down as the bottom of the loop got closer to= the ground.=A0 Reg's Rjeloop program was calibrated to some unspecifi= ed ground condition - I found that my losses were less than his program pr= edicted, but I believe that the trend for higher losses at lower elevation= s was correct.

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 If you are running high power there will be considerab= le voltages from conductor to ground - I have a problem when its raining= with the insulation breaking down and catching vegetation on fire. (My lo= op conductors are RG-11 and RG214 coax). I try to space the cable as far= away as possible from trees, leaves etc and run high power (> 1kW) in= dry weather which seems to be enough to prevent insulation breakdown.

--
73 Warren K2ORS
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XGJ
= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 WE2XEB/2
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XGR/1



<= br>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Roger= Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:
Having consider= ed the antenna options for my small garden, I'm going to erect a TX lo= op antenna rather than a Marconi vertical for 136kHz: the earthing issues= are removed and it is easier to build a capacitor selection box (to tune= and match the loop) than wind a huge loading coil and match it. I've= seen some of the webpages dealing with these and understand basically wha= t is needed (large loop area, thick wire, capacitor match-box, dealing wit= h high RF currents, etc). I understand the loop will have directionality= and nulls.

My question is this. Is there any reason why the bottom of the loop= cannot be laid along the ground rather than elevated a few metres? Mo= st designs show the bottom elevated a bit, but if laid on the soil I could= use thick coax or multiple wires for part of the loop so reducing the loo= p resistance.

Views appreciated, although it may be a case of "suck it and see&= quot;.

73s
Roger G3XBM
=
--
ht= tp://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.u= k
h= ttp://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM=A0=A0 GQRP 1678=A0=A0=A0 ISW= L G11088



=A0
--0016363b8b889785a0048db60f15--