Return-Path: Received: from mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.137]) by air-ma02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA023-b4f54c6fb7ec61; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 07:26:36 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1D7583800009F; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 07:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Omm4T-0005O7-PJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:17:09 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Omm4T-0005Ny-AX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:17:09 +0100 Received: from n3-vm1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.23.157]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Omm4S-0003HX-Bk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:17:09 +0100 Received: from [98.137.27.132] by n3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Aug 2010 11:17:00 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.99] by t4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Aug 2010 11:16:59 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp103.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Aug 2010 11:16:59 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 954909.98458.bm@omp103.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 10785 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Aug 2010 11:16:59 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282389419; bh=/3LMRBcJICoeZ8EZDoPNbPTHAMyPtDiQAgWmfqkXLGA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PAlUSGhdxdEoxVgqil1uypGAi3pkg/ssgusd7WeuZzA40Ts/XB+XjmggoQ5RMpR2u6D+HhTiKajKuhLwBe/peXz3eLkR9Als7cQloDobFSQtK0v7ukydVC1u6TECOFz7qsevz5h3igeOuRv8i09TdARxPdr7VitK9f3an+ea7t8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mGpefQtiHG6w1zwXF/IDEcwNRaMUrterTiiDq0K5muHYkgkkdkuR0XWgGso2FrfqfeYoFa2OoSs2zQcZrgWn4VuCbc+CBCIqDi2DO991yxrAZ2qNMcCywiW+/iZijLdNm0YXsSIVbWGqlLiDKFO7uBjbrYMhy9DV5qkXBWCze5U=; Message-ID: <799698.10240.qm@web111908.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: a_zU54MVM1nh9doi4Q_xVu1ObS3LaW4lG1fvLA4AemHThD3 zbysDBchRHu5USVhHAlDJ_e5bY7ZMIswBTHhlxf9FxXCNwC93wrf1r.Wx70E jse56TN0O.b1CMDjSr6zY2Trfsiu9kEXYI_DRaFtn.ilij2YP4Tp4_gJ9KRz ATYcpY.bSGB.OMf66IIZ4fESRaIb99O3KXFqOCQDFcFk3vgyJc62ZW2kTYEu lYTxZDQiRwZj5AVrmLhM10nsGsMT5c9JzF15AaYngizdmxtbSfywGCrf0AY0 Ukcp91R0VzZfRmIZ6tAQUb6QrrdCuKGs- Received: from [87.10.205.130] by web111908.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 04:16:59 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <4125DDF2320841FD873656DCED8C3B26@JimPC> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 04:16:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniele Tincani To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4125DDF2320841FD873656DCED8C3B26@JimPC> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: OT - RF noise from PC display: LCD vs CRT Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-143535977-1282389419=:10240" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m275.2 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60894c6fb7ea4b9b X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-143535977-1282389419=:10240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi LF, VLF, currently I have a CRT monitor which of course is a bit cumbersome compare= d with=20 a slim LCD one. On the other hand, I have done a very simple RF noise test= with=20 an LCD TV/monitor I had in another room and=A0I have found the LCD is=20 significantly noisier than the CRT. I have simply checked the noise using= a=20 portable radio close to the screen on LF (abt 300KHz) and MF (abt 900KHz). The LCD generates RF noise even when powered off (because of an internal= power=20 supply, I suppose), while the CRT doesn't. As I plan to use my SDR in LF/MF in the vicinity of the PC (and my poor VL= F loop=20 antenna usually sits only five meters apart), the RF noise from monitor co= uld be=20 an important factor. Did you find similar or different results in your experience? Best regards Daniele =20 --0-143535977-1282389419=:10240 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi LF, VLF,
currently I have a CRT monitor which of course is a bit cumbersome co= mpared with a slim LCD one. On the other hand, I have done a very simple= RF noise test with an LCD TV/monitor I had in another room and I hav= e found the LCD is significantly noisier than the CRT. I have simply check= ed the noise using a portable radio close to the screen on LF (abt 300KHz)= and MF (abt 900KHz).
The LCD generates RF noise even when powered off (because of an inter= nal power supply, I suppose), while the CRT doesn't.
As I plan to use my SDR in LF/MF in the vicinity of the PC (and my po= or VLF loop antenna usually sits only five meters apart), the RF noise fro= m monitor could be an important factor.
Did you find similar or different results in your experience?
Best regards
Daniele

--0-143535977-1282389419=:10240--