Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mh11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.223]) by air-dd09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD091-860f4c6a5ac838c; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:47:52 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mh11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CA8E3380000BA; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:47:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OlIku-0001ku-CR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:46:52 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OlIkt-0001kl-RW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:46:51 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OlIks-0005T2-O5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:46:51 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o7H9kNKU002363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:46:23 +0200 Received: from [129.206.29.99] (pc99.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.99]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id o7H9kmUD014941 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:46:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4C6A5A2D.4040803@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:45:17 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4C694CC6.3010609@o2.ie> <1282007441.6432.12.camel@vaio3rd> <1282014113.6432.22.camel@vaio3rd> <1282025562.6432.54.camel@vaio3rd> <000f01cb3de6$040e2780$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <1282036245.6432.81.camel@vaio3rd> In-Reply-To: <1282036245.6432.81.camel@vaio3rd> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Earth electrodes antenna tests[Contest results] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60df4c6a5ac642bf X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Rick, Am 17.08.2010 11:10, schrieb Rick Wakatori: > This is an example of sending by the two earth electrodes antenna. > I hope more experimeters will got a same trend. > 7L1RLL Rick > This weekend, i plan to do a test with a 600m spaced earth electrode antenna on 8970 Hz (if the QRN is reasonably low). TX power will be somewhat between 150 W and 600 W. The RX station is in about 50 km distance. It would be 5x the current record distance with earth electrode antennas on VLF! Markus/DF6NM will also watch the QRG but 174 km distance is not really probably. Marco/DD7PC, would you also be interested to watch? Your system seems to work now, as seen on 6470 Hz! :-) 73 all, Stefan/DK7FC