Message-ID: <4C69AAB7.5070006@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:16:39 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4C694CC6.3010609@o2.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4C694CC6.3010609@o2.ie>
Subject: Re: LF: Earth electrode antenna tests
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hello Tony,

Thanks for that interesting work!
Could you extend the measurements to the VLF band? It would be 
interesting what the levels and directivity would be there.

73 and pse a sked for your upcoming LF stn! :-)

Stefan/DK7FC

Am 16.08.2010 16:35, schrieb Tony:
>  Yesterday I spent some time playing with different antennae.
> I started by laying out another wire 52m long orientated roughly 
> north/south and then I shortened my original wire also to be 52m and 
> this one is east/west, both terminated with an earth rod.
> Results were not as expected however as although the two earth 
> electrode antennae show most definite directivity they were the wrong 
> direction.
>
> I monitored BBC R. Bristol on 1548 KHz which is about 500 Km due east 
> of me and on the inverted L (tuned VSWR 1.6:1) I could just detect a 
> carrier heterodyne, on the N/S earth electrode antenna it was S1 but 
> on the E/W earth electrode antenna it was S3.
> RNE5 on 531 KHz about 960 Km due south of me was S3 on the E/W and S8 
> on the N/S
>
> HGA22 (135 KHz) to my east was S4 on the E/W and S1 on N/S
>
> Readings were taken about 12:00 utc so most definitely ground wave.
>
> I was expecting the directivity to be broadside on the earth electrode 
> antennae, but they seem to behave like a Beverage in that respect, but 
> something that I think I will investigate further, maybe see if there 
> is any difference if I terminate them with a resistor.
> I'm sure Mal is correct though that they would be useless to TX 
> through but for RX they seem to have possibilities especially after 
> dark as they are a lot quieter.
>
> All good fun.
> 73, Tony, EI8JK.