Return-Path: Received: from mtain-di07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-di07.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.11]) by air-mc03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMC031-a8db4c6fc9c6202; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:42:46 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-di07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 34927380000A5; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:42:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OmnNw-0006JX-1B for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:41:20 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OmnNv-0006JO-0S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:41:19 +0100 Received: from n4a.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.67]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OmnNu-0003ss-15 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:41:18 +0100 Received: from [76.13.13.25] by n4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Aug 2010 12:41:11 -0000 Received: from [98.137.27.132] by t4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Aug 2010 12:41:10 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.99] by t4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Aug 2010 12:41:10 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp103.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Aug 2010 12:41:10 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 680203.52263.bm@omp103.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 11588 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Aug 2010 12:41:10 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282394470; bh=4pzkls2UE/9kFpY+XPFyCeKTmr59UT+yMrL+grmYKNg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=a8QecHIsbBgx5c/xP1t7EQvqLUvVF3L3XORnURHBDehVD8WI//EmYBFRqMshvdLT0bxaiz543c6SHI8vZPaUsnGINzVoub++Wyp94ymROuHS1ljj3G8eoI/A2Y5xTGxnyiJV2cAaY75NqP4urZIi8+1iJQeq4GPtLEleNb8b51g= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D1gqt5+ft/CbxPd05wKkI5bZNV6CeikTV5eKAh1fGKGVJ+sNvVVx9xVFjNN6QpYLs2KUzH/ZFanndoUghFVpufjVibCSpk5E4eF63lsfwYsS3tUv/6KpMJpHtIb5/xzmah1OQekZs8ftUA9rTMdHlplwv/yaWIPjAZvYba7P0zc=; Message-ID: <395095.11249.qm@web111920.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 9OOTcOoVM1m6_CXfzKy.iWvIOo7cBTsFsE.hVF7gQetS24f Sw8NINiLroXSc4B0JlqcN.oKZ2dkyXV6TmdB7yyKgynlXWS5fpHrQFKPYds4 8L4QT4cqfrB9SaysatwUD.Kr._S5FdwgTvSotcb8KPVNANDMYSDHZX9orX6H yzGQ7blGMgcaWyhU12m8oQU56m6.VCcz1MuY5.I2oZQ8ZV6tFlmZiC_wwVgh OJ3M2rLTggkeXnezABbh1Tf8NntmazSjliWFCAbAP.1V_BHoPx4F9SeMlOt0 xgscbv4Z4OhdPICzXw_Cpu1CGOcZZ47pP8pnBSJIzlecrWsrCaTwxsqxRfn3 7lJcn22OWzBlatwk- Received: from [87.10.205.130] by web111920.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:41:10 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <4125DDF2320841FD873656DCED8C3B26@JimPC> <799698.10240.qm@web111908.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4C6FC2BD.1030100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:41:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniele Tincani To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4C6FC2BD.1030100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: OT - RF noise from PC display: LCD vs CRT Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-213656474-1282394470=:11249" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m263.1 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d400b4c6fc9c470d9 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-213656474-1282394470=:11249 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Stefan, Thank you for your reply.Yes I think you are right.=A0So probably I will= let time=20 take the decision :-) As long as the CRT survives, I will stay with it (at= least=20 I know I can switch it off while the received signal is recorded on the ha= rd=20 disk e.g. at nigth). Then I suppose I will=A0move to an LCD one to save sp= ace and=20 power. Cheers Daniele ________________________________ From: Stefan Sch=E4fer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sat, August 21, 2010 2:12:45 PM Subject: Re: LF: OT - RF noise from PC display: LCD vs CRT Hi Daniele, The older CTR monitor seems to have a "real" switch that yust disconnect= the=20 mains from the supply (like it should be!). As you said, there is QRM near= the=20 both monitors. The SMPS in the LCD monitor is active all the time, so ther= e is=20 QRM all the time but it should be just detectable in some 10 cm. The question is, if and how the noise is (hopefully) decoupled from the ca= bles=20 going in and out from/to the monitor. This is essential since your RX ante= nna=20 will not be placed in the near of the monitor, i suppose ;-)=20 For example, i have very good experience with my tiny netbook as a VLF RX= =20 although it has a LCD display near the internal soundcard and the keyboard= as=20 well. So the LCD monitors are not worse in principal. EMC is an issue at= all=20 monitors so you have just to check the difference in your case. 73, cu, Stefan Am 21.08.2010 13:16, schrieb Daniele Tincani:=20 Hi LF, VLF, > >currently I have a CRT monitor which of course is a bit cumbersome compar= ed with=20 >a slim LCD one. On the other hand, I have done a very simple RF noise tes= t with=20 >an LCD TV/monitor I had in another room and=A0I have found the LCD is=20 >significantly noisier than the CRT. I have simply checked the noise using= a=20 >portable radio close to the screen on LF (abt 300KHz) and MF (abt 900KHz)= . >The LCD generates RF noise even when powered off (because of an internal= power=20 >supply, I suppose), while the CRT doesn't. >As I plan to use my SDR in LF/MF in the vicinity of the PC (and my poor= VLF loop=20 >antenna usually sits only five meters apart), the RF noise from monitor= could be=20 >an important factor. >Did you find similar or different results in your experience? > >Best regards >Daniele > > =20 --0-213656474-1282394470=:11249 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Stefan,
Thank you for your reply.
Yes I think you are right. So pro= bably I will let time take the decision :-) As long as the CRT survives,= I will stay with it (at least I know I can switch it off while the receiv= ed signal is recorded on the hard disk e.g. at nigth). Then I suppose I wi= ll move to an LCD one to save space and power.
Cheers
Daniele
=

From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <= ;schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sent: Sat, August 21, 2010 2:12:45 PM
Subject: Re: LF: OT - RF noise fro= m PC display: LCD vs CRT

Hi Daniele,

The older CTR mo= nitor seems to have a "real" switch that yust disconnect the mains from th= e supply (like it should be!). As you said, there is QRM near the both mon= itors. The SMPS in the LCD monitor is active all the time, so there is QRM= all the time but it should be just detectable in some 10 cm.

The= question is, if and how the noise is (hopefully) decoupled from the cable= s going in and out from/to the monitor. This is essential since your RX an= tenna will not be placed in the near of the monitor, i suppose ;-)
For example, i have very good experience with my tiny netbook as a VLF RX although it ha= s a LCD display near the internal soundcard and the keyboard as well. So= the LCD monitors are not worse in principal. EMC is an issue at all monit= ors so you have just to check the difference in your case.

73, cu,= Stefan

Am 21.08.2010 13:16, schrieb Daniele Tincani:=20
Hi LF, VLF,
currently I have a CRT monitor which of course is a bit cumbersome co= mpared with a slim LCD one. On the other hand, I have done a very simple= RF noise test with an LCD TV/monitor I had in another room and I hav= e found the LCD is significantly noisier than the CRT. I have simply check= ed the noise using a portable radio close to the screen on LF (abt 300KHz)= and MF (abt 900KHz).
The LCD generates RF noise even when powered off (because of an inter= nal power supply, I suppose), while the CRT doesn't.
As I plan to use my SDR in LF/MF in the vicinity of the PC (and my po= or VLF loop antenna usually sits only five meters apart), the RF noise fro= m monitor could be an important factor.
Did you find similar or different results in your experience?
Best regards
Daniele

<= /div>
--0-213656474-1282394470=:11249--