Return-Path: Received: from mtain-di11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-di11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.15]) by air-md03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMD032-8b7d4c552b7a1ac; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 04:08:26 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-di11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B497E3800008D; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 04:08:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OfTZv-0006zs-6T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:07:27 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OfTZu-0006zh-Le for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:07:26 +0100 Received: from fmmailgate07.web.de ([217.72.192.248]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OfTZt-000531-UK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:07:26 +0100 Received: from mwmweb079 ( [172.20.18.97]) by fmmailgate07.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0434638BBF5 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 10:07:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [84.63.109.238] by mwmweb079 with HTTP; Sun Aug 01 10:07:20 CEST 2010 Message-ID: <1264897274.1019127.1280650040009.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb079> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 10:07:20 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Horst_St=F6cker?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4C51FA69.1030202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4C529C6B.9070908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4C53EB92.4000806@legal-medicine.de> <4C53F284.7070307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>, <003e01cb30c5$fc7cf7d0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <672556391.1014007.1280648512218.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb079>, <4C5528B4.504@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <4C5528B4.504@freenet.de> X-UI-Message-Type: mail X-UI-ATTACHMENT-ID-POSTFIX: 4ad6463a-b50e-4c16-b908-9a56761b2a04 X-Priority: 3 Importance: normal Sensitivity: Normal X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19EluB2n4MkRXsq+Mn55XRBd0zfNxb4IpLHuwEonz50gmOHaXPSpnp8 bdy17n78zdZP9LQpV/u1TwCkK/VaO+XVC6WgL/Sl2e8GVAK548fyfg== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: VLF: DK7FC's 6th VLF kite experiment Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d400f4c552b780e24 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Thank you Wolf, maybe it'S too early in the morning, HI. I tried changing the center frequency several times without changing the= frequency range and vice versa. After I changed both, it works. Thank you - and Mal will be happy too ;-)) Horst DO1KHS/DI2AN -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht----- Von: "Wolfgang B=C3=BCscher" Gesendet: 01.08.2010 09:56:36 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: VLF: DK7FC's 6th VLF kite experiment >Horst, >You need to change the frequency of the "1st mixer" : >Options.. FFT Settings ... Center Frequency [Hz] . >This reprograms the software NCO, and thus the displayable frequency rang= e. > >Cheers, > Wolf . > >Horst St=C3=B6cker schrieb: >> Hello all, >> I have the same question. The 9khz_4mHz.usr can not be set to 6kHz just= by changing the frequency range or the center frequency. I am sure it's= a simple trick, but I could not find out. So I will have to use other set= tings - or someone has a quick hint. >> QRM/QRN is relatively low this morning. Possibly to high, but I will ig= ve it a try. >> I am receiving with my T-Antenna and a my new hombrew preamp and soundc= ard. >> Stefan, good luck - and to all the thousands of listeners, hi. >> vy73 Horst DO1KHS/DI2AN >> >> >> -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: mal hamilton >> Gesendet: 31.07.2010 17:35:20 >> An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Betreff: Re: VLF: DK7FC's 6th VLF kite experiment >> >> =20 >>> Stefan >>> Who has a RX setup that will be able to look for your signal, I seem= to be >>> the only one so far. There is a trace on 8.97 at present but noone els= e can >>> see it. >>> There is very little response via this reflector and vy little acty at >>> present on 137 and 500. >>> de mal/g3kev >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer"=20 >>> To: >>> Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 10:53 AM >>> Subject: Re: VLF: DK7FC's 6th VLF kite experiment >>> >>> >>> =20 >>>> Hello Peter, >>>> >>>> Better say 6,6 +-200 Hz. It is still not certain where the resonance >>>> will be, sorry. There are to many assumtions, estimations and >>>> =20 >>> calculations. >>> =20 >>>> On 137 kHz the measured C for 100m is 580pF (measured with a RC bridg= e >>>> and by measuring the L and calculating C). But EZNEC shows a lower C. >>>> This could be, since a 100m vertical is not absolutely short against >>>> Lambda and so the sems to occur some impedance transformation which >>>> "looks/behaves" like a higherC. >>>> >>>> On <9 kHz the 100m wire IS short against lambda and so i loose this >>>> benefit. There, the actual C is present. The L of my variometer part= in >>>> the BIG coil is estimated to be 30 mH. Maybe it is even more and the >>>> overall L is higher than L(coil)+L(variometer) due to the better >>>> magnetic coupling. So maybe i have less C and more L than thought on= 8,97. >>>> >>>> When doubling the antenna height from 100m to 200m and assuming 5 pF/= m >>>> the C is doubled as well. So i thought i will come out at 6,34 kHz >>>> (8,97/sqrt(2)). But this may just a rough estimate. EZNEC says the C >>>> factor is not 2 but 1,88 so i would come out some 100 Hz above. >>>> >>>> So the question is: >>>> What is the actual antenna C for 100m >>>> What is the actual (maximum and average) L >>>> What is the C factor when going from 100m to 200m >>>> >>>> This are many uncertainties and so i didn't want to tap the coil at= 70% >>>> of the winding to come back to 8,97 kHz but first just to measure out >>>> where the resonance will be, to solve these open Questions. Of course= , >>>> another important and very interesting issue is propagation in the 46= km >>>> band! :-) >>>> >>>> So, sorry for that coarse frequency range. Maybe the actual QRG will= be >>>> written here in the reflector and can be seen on my garbber2 but firs= t >>>> lets hope for proper WX! >>>> >>>> 73 and tnx, Stefan/DK7FC >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 31.07.2010 11:23, schrieb pws: >>>> =20 >>>>> Hi Stefan, >>>>> >>>>> Question: do you have a realistic guess of the frequency window of= your >>>>> transmission around 6.5kHz, e.g. +-100Hz? >>>>> >>>>> You wrote: >>>>> >>>>> =20 >>>>>> .... >>>>>> on *Sunday, the 1. August*, i will make a new kite experiment. >>>>>> ... >>>>>> i will transmit at arround *6,5 kHz, >>>>>> ... >>>>>> Starting time is* 8 UTC*, maybe some time later >>>>>> ... >>>>>> TX QTH is as usual in JN49IS, 49.77647N 8.699525. >>>>>> >>>>>> =20 >>>>> Distance is 516km, heading 10deg. to Kiel. >>>>> >>>>> Just modified the software running at ~17mHz of resolution. Antennas= are >>>>> two crossed ferrite loops feeding some BC550 in parallel buffered by >>>>> NE5532. Both amplifiers are connected to a M-Audio Audiophile 192 >>>>> =20 >>> running >>> =20 >>>>> at 24 kHz on an Intel Atom 330 "shoe-box" under Linux. >>>>> >>>>> 73 from Baltic Sea, >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> =20 >>> =20 >> ___________________________________________________________ >> WEB.DE DSL ab 19,99 Euro/Monat. Bis zu 150,- Euro Startguthaben und=20 >> 50,- Euro Geldpr=C3=A4mie inklusive! https://freundschaftswerbung.web.d= e >> >> >> >> =20 > > ___________________________________________________________ Neu: WEB.DE De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! =20 Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: https://produkte.web.de/go/demail02