Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mc04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.76]) by air-db04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB044-86984c5af7a9bf; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:40:57 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B95D438060BD9; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:15:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Oh34x-0003rT-S2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:13:59 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Oh34x-0003rK-3B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:13:59 +0100 Received: from mailout10.t-online.de ([194.25.134.21]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh34w-0005CU-Ar for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:13:59 +0100 Received: from fwd03.aul.t-online.de (fwd03.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout10.t-online.de with smtp id 1Oh34u-0000Uy-ON; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:13:56 +0200 Received: from e7010 (JJLj9+ZAohdBNBgNMLHtfrMgF9qrYmGM-amE0pgON-JicJgpS5q7TkNqYRJbwA8w4t@[84.147.228.144]) by fwd03.aul.t-online.de with smtp id 1Oh34N-2CbSLY0; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:13:23 +0200 Message-ID: <002101cb34b9$334d2900$6402a8c0@e7010> From: "Walter und Marianne Staubach" To: References: <001201cb34b1$863dbd80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:13:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 X-ID: JJLj9+ZAohdBNBgNMLHtfrMgF9qrYmGM-amE0pgON-JicJgpS5q7TkNqYRJbwA8w4t X-TOI-MSGID: 11210073-0b6b-4c04-9c1a-c7a333bc96f3 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: VLF GRABBER Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001E_01CB34C9.F5F6E3A0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604c4c5ae39f19cd X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CB34C9.F5F6E3A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, Mal, I am equipped to RX on 8,970 KHz at any time. Congrats on yo= ur low coil 145 mH. The mine for the backyard antenna is about 1 H! 73 Walter DJ2LF / DI2AG ----- Original Message -----=20 From: mal hamilton=20 To: rsgb=20 Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 5:18 PM Subject: LF: VLF GRABBER VLF GRP =20 =20 Is there anyone in a position to redirect their LF/MF grabber for VL= F eg 8.97 Kcs=20 This band seems to be attracting some interest at present. I have resonated my 137 Kcs antenna system for 8.97 Kcs. The loading= coil needed was around 145 mH, I hope to reduce this in the future= by adding more top loading wires. I can supply about 5W to the antenna, but the ERP at this level woul= d be extremely low, and probably not radiate vy far. I am looking for= a suitable amp for future experiments when a permit is available.=20 Are there many amateurs equipped to RX on VLF? Resonating my antenna system made a tremendous improvement to receiv= ed signals compared to the inv L's at at their natural frequency. 73 de mal/g3kev =20 ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CB34C9.F5F6E3A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes, Mal, I am equipped to RX on 8,97= 0 KHz at any=20 time. Congrats on your low coil 145 mH. The mine for the backyard ante= nna is=20 about 1 H!

73 Walter DJ2LF / DI2AG

----- Original Message -----

From:=20 mal=20 hamilton

To: rs= gb

Sent: Thursday, August 05, 20= 10 5:18=20 PM

Subject: LF: VLF GRABBER

VLF GRP &nb= sp; =20

Is there anyone in a position to=20 redirect their LF/MF grabber for VLF eg 8.97 Kcs

This band seems to be attracting so= me interest at=20 present.

I have resonated my 137 Kcs antenna= system for=20 8.97 Kcs. The loading coil needed was around 145 mH, I hope to= reduce=20 this in the future by adding more top loading wires.

I can supply about 5W to the antenn= a, but the ERP=20 at this level would be extremely low, and probably not radiate vy fa= r. I am=20 looking for a suitable amp for future experiments when a permit is= available.=20

Are there many amateurs equipped to= RX on=20 VLF?

Resonating my antenna system made= a tremendous=20 improvement to received signals compared to the inv L's at at their= natural=20 frequency.

73 de mal/g3kev

------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CB34C9.F5F6E3A0--