Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.202]) by air-md04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMD041-8b804c434381e3; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:10:09 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-de02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8459D380000C7; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:10:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OaYIA-00046s-Az for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:08:46 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OaYI9-00046j-RQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:08:45 +0100 Received: from mail-bw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OaYI8-0003ok-Af for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:08:45 +0100 Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so2374283bwz.16 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:08:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zkQ8tzdr0xnoY4j27gUc4/q+ZPc3urv5vTcHC0YtXIE=; b=Jktgc1B8dSBlvEgqGlZlQLHzLprIbt09pYHcGnv/NkQ2ZJNs6d04TeMrLJmOmeX+fK zE5tDW/8CIP8MtiWoT5mOJGH+BXN6/38pFvTAlO4Q9+iz9/tHh28CQaMYPklt+dvID5+ VKUpSp8qdx1Lj6gYKCMma3cjtnxNHRk3SzR0w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hJFTccIgkd94RRCokJZPfOJuKQAKEn1Y5s9cONMnZL3Zq9kGFtKenEAslEFN4/U+Mh L0yudWXN8iaBDVisPP25/kr8XW5DnPEEAFmM7phArF+CjnOVgm3cbGuFhSY5a7mUB9H7 wVCks1QQwzDYa/yuVAG7jIXglg3PuYXbvTx6k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.130.84 with SMTP id r20mr3123978bks.90.1279476523003; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.122.148 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:08:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:08:42 +0100 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: 136.96kHz testing Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517447eeaa6ef59048bad578f X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BE_AMAZED,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d230.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ca4c43437f1e6c X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --001517447eeaa6ef59048bad578f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thank you Gary. Yes, I hope to give 136kHz a good go considering my small garden and QRP leanings. Last autumn and winter I surprised myself (and others) by achieving credible results on 500kHz with an ultra-simple QRP station. It will be tougher on 136kHz certainly, but I start with low expectations that, with some perseverance, may be exceeded. Next on the cards is the transverter design and build. There are plenty of good circuits to grab ideas from, plus I have some of my own. The efficient small antenna will be the really big challenge. 73s Roger G3XBM On 18 July 2010 18:51, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > Roger, > > Congratulations for Txing a 136 kHz signal, however small, don't let anyone > put you off (no names mentioned) we all have to start somewhere. My first > 136 kHz Tx was 5 watts & an 80m inverted V antenna, I didn't have any QSO's > with that but it was a start. > > You will make progress & I will look forward to Rxing your signal in the > near future & a possible QSO. > > 73 > > Gary - G4WGT. > > > On 18 July 2010 17:14, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > >> *This is the very beginning of my journey onto 136kHz.... >> >> *For anyone very *very* close to Burwell, Cambs, JO02DG, I'm putting a >> QRP 10wpm keyer-generated CW message (later to be changed to QRSS3) out on >> 136.96kHz CW into my earth electrode antenna. Power from the TX is about >> 500mW, so ERP is just a few microwatts at most. >> >> I'd appreciate reports, but be amazed to get any until I start to run some >> more power into a real antenna. >> >> 73s >> Roger G3XBM >> >> >> -- >> http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ >> http://www.g3xbm.co.uk >> http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm >> G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 >> > > -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 --001517447eeaa6ef59048bad578f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you Gary.

Yes, I hope to give 136kHz a good go considering= my small garden and QRP leanings. Last autumn and winter I surprised myse= lf (and others) by achieving credible results on 500kHz with an ultra-simp= le QRP station. It will be tougher on 136kHz certainly, but I start with= low expectations that, with some perseverance, may be exceeded.

Next on the cards is the transverter design and build. There are plent= y of good circuits to grab ideas from, plus I have some of my own. The eff= icient small antenna will be the really big challenge.

73s
Roge= r G3XBM

=A0

On 18 July 2010 18:51, Gary - G4= WGT <g4wgt@tis= cali.co.uk> wrote:
Roger,

Congratulations for Txing a 136 kHz signal, howe= ver small, don't let anyone put you off (no names mentioned) we all ha= ve to start somewhere. My first 136 kHz Tx was 5 watts & an 80m invert= ed V antenna, I didn't have any QSO's with that but it was a start= .

You will make progress & I will look forward to Rx= ing your signal in the near future & a possible QSO.

73

Gary - G4WGT.<= /font>


On 18 July 2010 17:14, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com= > wrote:
This is the very beginning of my journey onto 136kHz....

=
For anyone very very close to Burwell, Cambs, JO02DG, I'm= putting a QRP 10wpm keyer-generated CW message (later to be changed to QR= SS3) out on 136.96kHz CW into my earth electrode antenna. Power from the= TX is about 500mW, so ERP is just a few microwatts at most.=A0

I'd appreciate reports, but be amazed to get any until I start to= run some more power into a real antenna.

73s
Roger G3XBM


--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.u= k
h= ttp://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM=A0 =A0 GQRP 1678=A0 =A0 =A0= ISWL G11088




--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM=A0 =A0 GQRP 1678=A0 =A0 =A0 ISWL G11088
--001517447eeaa6ef59048bad578f--