Return-Path: Received: from mtain-md11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-md11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.95]) by air-ma07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA073-b52e4c3e283d35c; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:12:29 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-md11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id ED2CC380000B2; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:12:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OZ9E0-0006Uc-Fo for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:10:40 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OZ9E0-0006UT-0I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:10:40 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OZ9Dz-0005cG-BH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:10:39 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6ELAXmE009592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:10:33 +0200 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6ELAc6V015896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:10:38 +0200 Received: from [147.142.8.155] (vpn508-155.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [147.142.8.155]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o6ELAGT2001999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:10:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4C3E27D4.3060407@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:10:44 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4C363DCD.303@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>,<4C3650A1.6040104@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<4C3DA75D.80407@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<263121BD51374246B3F184A43B2E9619@JimPC> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: RE: RE: DLF passive received with earth antenna Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605f4c3e28394059 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hello Rik and the group, Agreed! But i think it is rather easy to make a comparison measurement with a samller loop (to the same time). This, i did today in the evening :-) Riding my bike to the earth antenna means passing 400m altitude difference and i become faster each day, currently 40 min :-))). So i used a 1m*1m single turn loop and the OP AMP circuit i built yesterday. The signal level of DHO38 was as usual -20 dB (changing abt +- 1 dB, maybe due to modulation). Sadly the background noise is determined by the OP AMP, means no signal of DHO38 when using the small loop. This background noise is -80 dB or less. So, this means that DHO38 is at least 60 dB stronger on the earth antenna (we regard only the signal levels, not the S/N). This means that the effective antenna area is at least 1000 m^2 which is not surprising since the average height of the wire above gnd GND is 4m and the distance between the two earth electrodes is 280m :-( So, nothing is won with this test. I have to do it again. Maybe tomorrow ;-) Since the OP AMP is not really a low noise type (TLC271), i will change it (to OP27 or LT1028) and hope for better reception. Of course i can reduce the FFT time as well (was not possible today since upcoming thunderstorms forced me to make QRT ;-) ). 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 14.07.2010 18:06, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > Stefan, Jim, LF group, > > I agree with Jim that an earth antenna most likely will not act completely as a loop antenna. > But as an engineer it doesn't matter to me too much, I am more interested in the efficiency of the antenna rather than how it works exactly. > To know the efficiency you would need to measure the power you can get out af the antenna from the DLF signal. > Knowing the ERP of DLF, the path attenuation and the antenna RX power you can calculate the antenna "gain". > To measure the antenna RX power properly you would have to cancel out any reactive component of the antenna and terminate it properly. > > 73, Rik ON7YD > > >