Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.202]) by air-de08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDE083-5ec04c4f3f56342; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:19:34 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 621523800009D; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:19:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Odqbk-0001sw-CO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:18:36 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Odqbj-0001sn-UV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:18:35 +0100 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Odqbi-00088R-Pe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:18:35 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmYFAE/cTkxOk8jT/2dsb2JhbACPRAODUoxKccM0hTYEizY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,270,1278284400"; d="scan'208,217";a="312895270" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.200.211]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 27 Jul 2010 21:18:28 +0100 Message-ID: <007601cb2dc8$df5d8bb0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <005601cb2dbf$c836d030$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:18:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: QSO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0073_01CB2DD1.40CC3290" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ca4c4f3f551d9d X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CB2DD1.40CC3290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How could going backwards be Positive !!!! Check the records for years= gone by on 137 and look at what is happening today. I am but pointing out the facts, has noone learnt anything from infor= mation published over the past several years.=20 I was getting 579 reports from NC1K years ago on 137 but today it seem= s to be a struggle for some to be heard a few hundred metres away Prove me wrong ? g3kev =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Roger Lapthorn=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:22 PM Subject: Re: LF: QSO Wonderful Mal. Do you never have ANYTHING positive to say? . 73s Roger G3XBM On 27 July 2010 20:13, mal hamilton wrote: There is no need for QRS around EU. In the past all EU was worked= on CW and daytime over 1000 miles plus on 137 kcs Maybe QRS for N America/China and further afield.=20 QRS around EU is a backward step and certainly not progress, and= earthed antennas !!! Need I say more? g3kev --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CB2DD1.40CC3290 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
How could going backwards be Positive= !!!! Check=20 the records for years gone by on 137 and look at what is happening=20 today.
I am but pointing out the facts, has= noone learnt=20 anything from  information published over the past several= years.=20
I was getting 579 reports from NC1K= years ago on=20 137 but today it seems to be a struggle for some to be heard a fe= w hundred=20 metres away
Prove me wrong ?
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010= 8:22=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QSO

Wonderful Mal. Do you never have ANYTHING positive to= =20 say?
.
73s
Roger G3XBM

On 27 July 2010 20:13, mal hamilton <g3kevm= al@talktalk.net>=20 wrote:
There is no need for QRS around= EU. In the past=20 all EU was worked on CW and daytime over 1000 miles plus on 137=20 kcs
Maybe QRS for N America/Chin= a and=20 further afield.
QRS around EU is a backward step= and certainly=20 not progress, and earthed antennas !!!  Need I say=20 more?
g3kev
 
 
 
 



--=20
http://g3xbm-qrp.= blogspot.com/
http://www= .g3xbm.co.uk
= http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM =20   GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088
------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CB2DD1.40CC3290--