Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.18]) by air-dd02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD023-86584c122f2346; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:42:11 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-ma10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 45B523800010B; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:42:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ON3Y1-0001Bn-Pl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:41:21 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ON3Y1-0001Be-ET for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:41:21 +0100 Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ON3Xz-0003CB-Gz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:41:21 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2010 12:41:11 -0000 Received: from 75-168-143-142.mpls.qwest.net (EHLO [192.168.1.100]) [75.168.143.142] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us002) with SMTP; 11 Jun 2010 08:41:11 -0400 X-Authenticated: #60769621 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18b2S47MvUbMdZRz/j8A545qA7M+veUAddUt6lYtV e5+OfbhWHIXb/z Message-ID: <4C122ED5.1090008@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:40:53 -0500 From: Mike-WE0H User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4C0C10E1.4090804@freenet.de><4C0C15BB.9010602@gmx.com><4C0C1960.5050708@freenet.de><4C0C1C35.2080401@gmx.com><4C0EB8AC.2070508@freenet.de> <53EF46B489244A09B02F194D6CD79DAB@df2py> <4C101E1F.7010501@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <3E76E4DCF3684D3E99582E065CA7486E@df2py> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C39@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <5E86B9622E084C7AABBED3AA4DF93ABF@df2py> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C3A@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <008901cb0961$23480030$0217aac0@desktop> In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: RE: move from loop to loaded aerial Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60124c122f212d35 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Do you have trees around where this Inverted L vertical will be? Mike WE0H Wolf O wrote: > Hi Jim ! > > Thanks for the info. I already have the antenna structure. I either use a > toploaded vertical abt 25 m high, or I load a long wire same height but much > larger. My question is whether the performance will be the same or not. > > I guess as there is no such thing as a free lunch in physics, the vertical > will be the superior performer. Then I have to calculate the antenna`s > capacity to get the inductivity rite. > > 73 de wolf