Return-Path: Received: from mtain-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.87]) by air-me10.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME104-8bc84c0d569e5; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:29:18 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 02411380007D8; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:29:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OLivm-0007Vr-7r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:28:22 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OLivl-0007Vi-SZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:28:21 +0100 Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OLivj-0004rJ-0M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:28:21 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Jun 2010 20:28:12 -0000 Received: from 75-168-143-142.mpls.qwest.net (EHLO [192.168.1.100]) [75.168.143.142] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us002) with SMTP; 07 Jun 2010 16:28:12 -0400 X-Authenticated: #60769621 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/J/lUS68bJYjZgaesLDRhov87aCZEGWPkPWHrrpO ogo8cIFvo24aE2 Message-ID: <4C0D565D.7030407@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:28:13 -0500 From: "Mike.WE0H" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <657E7065AC4C454AB63F6C7C2FF043F6@Black> <003101cb04c2$0913cc10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1607287044.1492139.1275754813942.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb034> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C24@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <7.0.1.0.1.20100606111158.018277a8@magma.ca> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C28@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <002001cb066b$9d0ddd70$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4C0D37C8.9030209@gmx.com> <003201cb066f$eb54a280$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <003201cb066f$eb54a280$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40574c0d569b5826 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Ah yes that NOV thing. Over here 9kc and down is free to use. Bummer for the UK guys stuck with the NOV thing. Mike WE0H Mal wrote: > Mike > In the UK most are opposed to big signals if what you read on here is true. > If I lived in the USA it would be a different story, especially way out > west, some amateur radio stations in California rival the commercials. > W6AM and W6HX were better equipped than the local BC and Coastal stations. I > have been to both. > > g3kev