Return-Path: Received: from mtain-md08.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-md08.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.92]) by air-mc07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMC074-a97e4c0fdd9d2fc; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:29:49 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-md08.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 16F1E380000B1; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:29:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OMQ0g-0004Hr-74 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:28:18 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OMQ0f-0004Hi-Qb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:28:17 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OMQ0d-0003yT-I1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:28:17 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AloFAJd5D0xOk8ts/2dsb2JhbACBQ5B8jBJxvzmFGAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,393,1272841200"; d="scan'208,217";a="294034493" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.203.108]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 09 Jun 2010 19:28:08 +0100 Message-ID: <001c01cb0801$7fdde870$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4C0C10E1.4090804@freenet.de><4C0C15BB.9010602@gmx.com><4C0C1960.5050708@freenet.de><4C0C1C35.2080401@gmx.com><4C0EB8AC.2070508@freenet.de> <53EF46B489244A09B02F194D6CD79DAB@df2py> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:28:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: DLVLF 8.97kHz tests Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01CB0809.E14C6840" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605c4c0fdd984f54 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01CB0809.E14C6840 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wolf I cannot detect any signal here and a loop is probably not the best an= tenna for VLF TX or LF or MF Mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Wolf Ostwald=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 6:28 PM Subject: LF: DLVLF 8.97kHz tests Hello Group ! DLVLF transmitting a continous carrier now on 8970 Hz ( Supposedly= ). I may be off somewhat, but Marco runs his calibrated card on my si= gnal, if I still cant produce a trace on Stefan`s grabber about 80 km= away, running 22 amps into a 6 Ohm antenna, then a loop is no good to= TX VLF. I keep u posted. 73 de wolf =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01CB0809.E14C6840 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Wolf
I cannot detect any signal here and= a=20 loop is probably not the best antenna for VLF TX or LF or=20 MF
 
Mal/g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Wolf= Ostwald=20
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 201= 0 6:28=20 PM
Subject: LF: DLVLF 8.97kHz te= sts

Hello Group=20 !

DLVLF transmitting a=20 continous carrier now on 8970 Hz ( Supposedly ). I may be off somewh= at, but=20 Marco runs his calibrated card on my signal, if I still cant produce= a trace=20 on Stefan`s grabber about 80 km away, running 22 amps into a 6 Ohm= antenna,=20 then a loop is no good to TX VLF. I keep u=20 posted.

73 de=20 wolf

 

<= /HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01CB0809.E14C6840--