Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.21]) by air-dc01.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC013-864d4bfcd51d1a; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:00:30 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2001138000082; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:00:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OHBT8-0001M5-JF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 08:56:02 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OHBT7-0001Lw-KV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 08:56:01 +0100 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OHBSz-0002Gi-TT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 08:56:01 +0100 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so490186fgg.10 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 00:55:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iuxzmq95cA58JDftB1gWDJoB6iyGyc6R7qPyP8loqgI=; b=R3y38b1KIUipVcSJV5WSG/yeaA7W77i/lsvk0Pe8uHNFVkMNJ8fG83ExD9K4dnzdzd SRSVIHfvJhUF52fFqfwahs2Pvbf8WATyPXCf6GmqnnGMnfZDLKzwogS5XTyTZkgnF3YS 31WDiGUowbpSdfU/iZoCv4OC8/r8HVRaoUq+s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ifRrolH/rNCuwUj0bCkqlEgSQa7Dkn6A7h8T2H+4JCAPqmVEMa9wKvRHQ1RkQK0ZFr q0ZJ332H5NaBo8I1Ex3Pn9+o3/mBN3z38kOyaIa/F4hFGNh0UkaGZss3cI8j3CrI4FGW KhIWWe6Km4ynscO23lawcT1bhqCaNM1eRpnH4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.25.8 with SMTP id x8mr3435693bkb.176.1274860547104; Wed, 26 May 2010 00:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.58.204 with HTTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C00@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:55:46 +0100 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: AW: 8.97kHz - Near field and radiated signals? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255588520c623e04877a9a60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: S X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d289.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41154bfcd5143e89 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0003255588520c623e04877a9a60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Jacek, Thanks for this encouraging information. I'll definitely try an e-field TX antenna later, although space is very limited in my garden. The grounded electrode pair "antenna" does appear to be quite effective, but I need to compare this against a TX e-field antenna and loop antenna. I've some questions: - What antenna did you use for RX? Loop, e-field probe? - Have you tried TXing using grounded electrodes? If so, what range did you achieve and what RX antenna did you use? Thanks again. 73s Roger G3XBM On 25 May 2010 22:30, Jacek Lipkowski wrote: > On Mon, 24 May 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > > - The best DX targets are quite modest: I would like to exceed 1km >> >> initially with the TX power I currently have (around 4W). If I could >> reach >> G6ALB in the next village 3kms away I would be delighted. If I got any >> further I would be both amazed and VERY happy! >> > > Roger - try an e-field antenna. for a few years i have been doing tests > with loops, and the results were not that good. the best distance was about > 700m in the city during wintertime with about 40W. i wish i had tried an > e-field antenna earlier. > > the first results with a 40m horizontal wire abt 15m up were far better. i > got 1.3 km without problems using about 3W in april (so more qrm than in > winter): > http://acid.ch.pw.edu.pl/~sq5bpf/ham/vlf/sq5bpf_vlf_test_20100406.jpg > > the matching was done via a tv transformer, which i see is getting quite > popular now :) > > since you're in a village area you will probably have much less qrm. 3km in > the winter seems to be a realistic goal. > > vy 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > > > -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 --0003255588520c623e04877a9a60 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jacek,

Thanks for this encouraging information. I'll definit= ely try an e-field TX antenna later, although space is very limited in my= garden.=A0 The grounded electrode pair "antenna" does appear to= be quite effective, but I need to compare this against a TX e-field anten= na and loop antenna.=A0 I've some questions:
  • What antenna did you use for RX? Loop, e-field probe?
  • Have= you tried TXing using grounded electrodes? If so, what range did you achi= eve and what RX antenna did you use?
Thanks again.

73= s
Roger G3XBM

On 25 May 2010 22:30, Jacek= Lipkowski <s= q5bpf@lipkowski.org> wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote:

=A0- The best DX targets are quite modest: I would like to exceed 1km
=A0initially with the TX power I currently have (around 4W). If I could= reach
=A0G6ALB in the next village 3kms away I would be delighted. If I got any=
=A0further I would be both amazed and VERY happy!

Roger - try an e-field antenna. for a few years i have been doing tests wi= th loops, and the results were not that good. the best distance was about= 700m in the city during wintertime with about 40W. i wish i had tried an= e-field antenna earlier.

the first results with a 40m horizontal wire abt 15m up were far better.= i got 1.3 km without problems using about 3W in april (so more qrm than= in winter): http://acid.ch.pw.edu.pl/~sq5bpf/= ham/vlf/sq5bpf_vlf_test_20100406.jpg

the matching was done via a tv transformer, which i see is getting quite= popular now :)

since you're in a village area you will probably have much less qrm.= 3km in the winter seems to be a realistic goal.

vy 73

Jacek / SQ5BPF






--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM =A0 =A0GQRP 1678 =A0 =A0 =A0ISWL G11088
--0003255588520c623e04877a9a60--