Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.11]) by air-mb07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB072-a7854beb0264b2; Wed, 12 May 2010 15:32:53 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B7F3838000154; Wed, 12 May 2010 15:32:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OCHeh-0006QI-Sr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 May 2010 20:31:43 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OCHeh-0006Q9-Cj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 May 2010 20:31:43 +0100 Received: from mail-fx0-f43.google.com ([209.85.161.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OCHee-000089-TS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 May 2010 20:31:43 +0100 Received: by fxm14 with SMTP id 14so446504fxm.16 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 12:31:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wBcT/JzY6ON9g30CZTaJN1qOaYyXz5MIZvBrMEKKiOU=; b=mwjwS9hlXXhBhUJGV5a6T0jKYbXVfxjLrlMNqgKlVj9AEa8xFTYluSEx61PeXBAQ1R KMP0CK1XOOiOg703nkBdKJ2nSzOeVVDSd+CEx+2VKvXtMj7oVLb3q8pllSmVMmzoHUuF jBv7B9/SkYu/8o25IMmcpSBhTUgUrYXy44Nkw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=NJeKWhQ/8QrLTRDOojaRTuOov1jG+sSxnhDJieDKol5nDPfwgNWJYRNzZl15hpq45N v/q5pLOHK8CB4JxYiEgh8/JBoJX31SUzctV96IyCEcZT3U1nFfqC+eLv/VQy0N7an1uE ws7Q98e+REnEnVgyh/r/8o6dc4SUJKX56R1g0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.136.15 with SMTP id p15mr370513bkt.172.1273692693493; Wed, 12 May 2010 12:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.67.68 with HTTP; Wed, 12 May 2010 12:31:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <003501caf1fd$9d39a0e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> References: <003501caf1fd$9d39a0e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 20:31:33 +0100 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Dreamer RX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174bf05c8c77c404866ab07f X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d268.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600b4beb02625be2 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0015174bf05c8c77c404866ab07f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mal, My "dreamers band" NoV has been with OFCOM since mid March. I chased it again last week. The hold-up is the Met Office, who have to vet sub-9kHz non-military applications. The men at OFCOM seem very keen to support these applications. In the meantime I'm experimenting with local induction and conduction at 1-9kHz using 4W. This is quite useful as I've been playing with various ideas for loops and receivers. I'm no expert and I'm probably rediscovering things that people knew long ago. Still, it keeps me out of mischief and I'm enjoying it. When I have the RX system optimised listening "by ear" I intend to try my PC out in the fields with QRSS or WSPR to extend range. Best DX is 0.35kms so far - only 899kms short of Stefan's best DX, hi. When TXing with grounded electrodes I found that a loop works better at the far end than grounded electrodes. I also suspect the distance is effected by soil moisture between the probes at the TX end (size of the underground loop?) as on Monday I could hear my signals further than today and everything else was unchanged. I've yet to try a voltage probe RX at sub-9kHz. The 80cm loop does seem to be useful as one can null mains hum and other noise sources. Close to houses and overhead cables the mains hum fog is appalling, but this drops very rapidly I've found as one moves away into open fields. Then the issue is electric fences (I think) pulsing away. 73s Roger G3XBM On 12 May 2010 19:04, mal hamilton wrote: > LF/MF > How many have a RX capable of working efficiently on 9 kHz, proper antenna > etc. Even on the higher LF/MF bands the weakness seems to be a good RX > SYSTEM. > Something better than a probe, small loop is preferable especially on 9 kHz > To date in the UK the uptake dreamers seem minimal, how many are actually > listening, and how many NOV'S have been either issued applied for? > > G3KEV > > > -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 --0015174bf05c8c77c404866ab07f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mal,

My "dreamers band" NoV has been with OFCOM since mid= March. I chased it again last week. The hold-up is the Met Office, who ha= ve to vet sub-9kHz non-military applications. The men at OFCOM seem very= keen to support these applications.

In the meantime I'm experimenting with local induction and conduct= ion at 1-9kHz using 4W. This is quite useful as I've been playing with= various ideas for loops and receivers. I'm no expert and I'm prob= ably rediscovering things that people knew long ago. Still, it keeps me ou= t of mischief and I'm enjoying it.

When I have the RX system optimised listening "by ear" I int= end to try my PC out in the fields with QRSS or WSPR to extend range. Best= DX is 0.35kms so far - only 899kms short of Stefan's best DX, hi. Whe= n TXing with grounded electrodes I found that a loop works better at the= far end than grounded electrodes. I also suspect the distance is effected= by soil moisture between the probes at the TX end (size of the undergroun= d loop?) as on Monday I could hear my signals further than today and every= thing else was unchanged.

I've yet to try a voltage probe RX at sub-9kHz. The 80cm loop does= seem to be useful as one can null mains hum and other noise sources. Clos= e to houses and overhead cables the mains hum fog is appalling, but this= drops very rapidly I've found as one moves away into open fields. The= n the issue is electric fences (I think) pulsing away.

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 12 May 201= 0 19:04, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:
LF/MF
How many have a RX capable of working= efficiently=20 on 9 kHz, proper antenna etc. Even on the higher LF/MF bands the weakness= seems=20 to be a good RX SYSTEM.
Something better than a probe, small= loop is=20 preferable especially on 9 kHz
To date in the UK=A0 the uptake dream= ers seem=20 minimal, how many are actually listening, and how many NOV'S have been= either=20 issued applied for?
=A0
G3KEV
=A0
=A0



--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM =A0 =A0GQRP 1678 =A0 =A0 =A0ISWL G11088
--0015174bf05c8c77c404866ab07f--