Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dh02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.22]) by air-me07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME072-8bb94be273fa3dd; Thu, 06 May 2010 03:47:06 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E017D38000093; Thu, 6 May 2010 03:47:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1O9vmT-0002O6-LW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 08:46:01 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1O9vmT-0002Nx-5W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 08:46:01 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1O9vmS-0004YZ-HE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 08:46:01 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o467jm8p002650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 6 May 2010 09:45:48 +0200 Received: from [129.206.29.99] (pc99.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.99]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id o467jxZT022121 for ; Thu, 6 May 2010 09:45:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4BE27420.2090900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 09:47:44 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: , <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1BE7@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <14250421.817531.1272459361995.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb078> <4BD93406.8030002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1BEA@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <4BE1A8D9.8050500@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <4BE1A8D9.8050500@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: VLF: Activity Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41164be273f86aee X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Thank you Paul. BTW, my special permission for a 300m kite vertical becomes more probably in the last time. Maybe i will get it in the summer, what is not optimal. But in that time i can make several tests and become experience with such high antennas. This will be useful for the autumn/winther time later. First i will try to make tests with a 200m vertical. Here a first test could be, to let the coil as it is and just increase the wire length. This means, i have 2x C and thus 0,7x f, so i can transmit on 6,3 kHz. Extreme dreaming! ;-) What about transmissions on 6,3 kHz, the 47km band? What about the noise there? Would reception be possible in your distance? What about propagation and ionospheric modes? Other, more preferable frequencies? For the weekend, the wx forecast is not very promising but i hope things will change... Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 05.05.2010 19:20, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > Stefan schrieb: > > > Paul (Nicholson), what do you think about the average QRN > > increase in the last weeks? > > I can't say at the moment. My rx is undergoing some major > alterations to hardware and software and the calibration is > void. I expect the background will have increased, but by how > much? I will try to get things back in order by the weekend. > > Too bad about the weather. > > I would like to see transmissions from base stations. Even > though the ERP is much lower, long transmissions become possible > and it would be interesting to try very long integrations (days). > > Meanwhile, I look forward to the next test, whenever the weather > permits. > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >