Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.206]) by air-mc04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMC044-a9324bfae0be141; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:25:34 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-de06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A04F8380011E2; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OGeCb-0005u5-Kj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 21:24:45 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OGeCb-0005tv-8T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 21:24:45 +0100 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OGeCZ-0007ti-EC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 May 2010 21:24:45 +0100 Received: from opc1 (opc1.twatt.home [192.168.21.6]) by svr1.twatt.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7BE3B444 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 20:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 21:24:40 +0100 From: John P-G To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <20100524212440.02f9ed6d@opc1> In-Reply-To: <755416.5065.qm@web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <003601cafaa8$a46b5df0$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <755416.5065.qm@web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Organization: The Gammy Bird X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.0; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: NIL LF/MF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ce4bfae0bc723a X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 On Sun, 23 May 2010 21:09:17 +0000 (GMT) M0FMT wrote: > Yep nothing on 600m. > =A0 > It's a dead band like the parrot it's an ex band. Since the Data > curse has fallen upon=A0600m, CW is dead. I was hoping that 600m would > be a nice band to develop what little skill I have as a CW op=A0 CW itself certainly isn't dead - listen to the bottom part of 160/80/40 &c.... As for 600m...in the time we've had access to 500kHz a total CW novice could have learned the code, achieved 40wpm and be thoroughly fluent in a new language - but not of course by sitting hoping for it to just happen organically by sticking solely to 500kHz with a flea power transmitter and a high urban noise floor....=20 500kHz has indeed historically been the place for real CW - but only from well equipped coast stations and ships floating on perfect salty ground planes. As landlocked hams this isn't, in general, our lot - but then again the band wasn't granted to us for that purpose.... If you're serious about developing your CW skills then there's ample scope elsewhere, and if you haven't done so yet then I don't think you can blame the activity levels on 500kHz for it. There might be a nice cluster of low power 500kHz CW operators in the home counties for whom it's possible to have nice comfortable CW QSOs - but this isn't the case across the UK as a whole.=20 But there's more to our investigation into the band than that, anyway. I wonder what you put on your application form for your own "Special Research Permit" - it can't surely have been "developing my CW skills....." - it must have been something a little bit more technical, surely?? John GM4SLV