Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd09.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.149]) by air-md03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMD032-8b7d4bf01c6d193; Sun, 16 May 2010 12:25:17 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dd09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9E752380000A9; Sun, 16 May 2010 12:25:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ODgdc-000621-Cp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 May 2010 17:24:24 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ODgdc-00061s-13 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 May 2010 17:24:24 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ODgdZ-0001TW-DB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 May 2010 17:24:24 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiARAIe470sCYhyV/2dsb2JhbACHXIooi3wDcbkDhRAE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,242,1272841200"; d="scan'208";a="292082217" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([2.98.28.149]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 16 May 2010 17:24:14 +0100 Message-ID: <001b01caf514$38c228c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <002701caf394$44cbd980$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4BEE8B1B.502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4BEE92AD.7090909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1BF2@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <78725D7A76904699A96BD89DB95FA9A3@ns94d01ae4d850> <4BF0107A.5060408@legal-medicine.de> Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 17:24:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=0.234 Subject: LF: Re: Re: DK7FCs 5th VLF experiment... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40954bf01c6a41bc X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 LF/MF It seems to me except one is using QRO power and really large TX antennas on 9 kHz the possibility of covering several hundred kilometres is remote. also there does not seem to be much enthusasism by the majority of LF/MF operators in fact there is hardly enough operators using 137 and 500 kHs The current acty on 137 is virtually NIL and 500 not far behind, also on these bands most have not progressed beyond the QRP stage and makes it difficult for others to copy except they are local to another station. There is very little real interest in LF/MF even the majority of the 27 Dutch stations active a few weeks ago have gone. 73 de G3KEV now in CQ CW mode on 500 ----- Original Message ----- From: "pws" To: Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 4:34 PM Subject: LF: Re: DK7FCs 5th VLF experiment... > Hi, > > No significant signal received in Kiel, North Germany. > > Best wishes, > Peter, df3lp >