Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mb12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mb12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.32]) by air-mf02.mail.aol.com (v128.1) with ESMTP id MAILINMF023-8bcf4bbf6a6618a; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:56:54 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mb12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9326438000137; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:56:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1O0IPz-0002mV-A8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:54:59 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1O0IPy-0002mM-Ti for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:54:58 +0100 Received: from cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1O0IPw-0004DO-8P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:54:58 +0100 Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D8C7B8047 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 19:54:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB-N2.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub-n2.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.12]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2B8F3862 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 19:54:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be ([10.112.11.13]) by ICTS-S-HUB-N2.luna.kuleuven.be ([10.112.9.12]) with mapi; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 19:54:43 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 19:53:47 +0200 Thread-Topic: Re: QRSS limiter Thread-Index: AcrXYc/H+0vnNa9xSkeHN98lnK5z5gAq8sye Message-ID: References: <4BBE16CB.23244.11610C0@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>,<6876ACB6572F47BC801F2268111C7E07@JimPC> In-Reply-To: <6876ACB6572F47BC801F2268111C7E07@JimPC> Accept-Language: nl-NL, nl-BE Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: nl-NL, nl-BE MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: RE: Re: QRSS limiter Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60204bbf6a641b0e X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Jim, Mike, what about IMD due to the non linear behavior of the clipping diodes ? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.or= g] namens James Moritz [james.moritz@btopenworld.com] Verzonden: donderdag 8 april 2010 23:21 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: LF: Re: QRSS limiter Dear Mike, LF Group, I have also used this technique on 137kHz, by the crude but reasonably effective method of turning off the AGC on my RA1792 RX and turning the RF gain control to max with AF gain fairly low, resulting in limiting in the= IF amplifier. However, on many amateur-type rigs, it isn't really possible to completely disable the AGC in this way, so you will have to provide some external form of limiting as Mike has done. > The background noise was much less 'clean' and Loran lines were a > little fainter, but when testing during the recent Russian evening I > got much better results on weak stations. Strong (audible) stations > showed some distortion, but it was easy to turn the receiver gain > down if necessary. Limiting seems to "blur" the spectral lines in the waterfall, I presume du= e to the QRN impulses and other noise effectively randomly modulating the narrow-band signals and so adding a form of noise sidebands to them. But overall, the effect is beneficial under conditions of high QRN, provided= no strong signals are present in the RX passband. It would be worth trying th= e Spectrum Lab limiter (with the RX gain turned back down of course), since this should be more tolerant of the presence of strong signals of varying levels. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU