Message-ID: <7F4AAE4C78244D19A3F0F5AB7CFE2938@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <618970.37366.qm@web28105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <005801cae88f$64116770$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004302051270.21716@paranoid.lipkowski.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004302051270.21716@paranoid.lipkowski.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:04:24 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: LF: ROS s/ware
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Close .. but  as  everyone uses the  same  software  its hardly secret ?

now  if you  could  gain access  and  alter the  random generator .. that 
would  cause  havoc ?

Its a  pity  as the  future  is  digital and a nice  wide  low power SS mode 
would  very  much enhance the
band  occupancy as it would  enable  multiple users  on the  same  frequency 
.. this  may be the  final
goal  for  ros as  already  its  possible to  stack more than one  qso  when 
in wide  band on the  same  channel
may be a  channel  selector  is  to  be added  changing the  code  sequence 
what  then ?

olivia  produced  100 % copy  when  you  could not  'see'  the  signal .. 
that was a  millstone ..  multiple  qso's
in the  noise at 100% copy  would  be  wonderful ...  could  even put all 
the  pactor  mailboxes  on  one
channel

G ..
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jacek Lipkowski" <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:31 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: ROS s/ware

>
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, mal hamilton wrote:
>
>> I see what u mean. I have checked the freq of interest and concluded that 
>> it is not a suitable mode for the narrow 500 kcs slot available to us. I 
>> wonder what is next on the appliance operators list.
>
> Mal, there is another problem - it is a closed mode, there is no source 
> code published etc. This is similar to someone inventing their own version 
> of CW, using it on the ham bands, and not telling anyone how to decode it 
> (ok, oversimplification, please refrain from comments about breaking 
> substitution ciphers etc :)
>
> VY 73
>
> Jacek / SQ5BPF
>
>
>