Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.19]) by air-mb04.mail.aol.com (v128.2) with ESMTP id MAILINMB041-a2394bc7413e212; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:39:26 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-ma11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E4AED380000B3; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:39:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1O2S51-0001p6-LQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:38:15 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1O2S51-0001ox-8N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:38:15 +0100 Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net ([193.180.251.57]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1O2S50-0001DK-H7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:38:15 +0100 X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7b85ae000005cbc-36-4bc740f44c9d Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id C6.32.23740.4F047CB4; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:38:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esealmw110.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.78]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:38:12 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:24:06 +0200 Message-ID: <4D95FB39404AA04CA998E7F63B1A2E5F0432C8A0@esealmw110.eemea.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <4BC7200F.3070208@telia.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: LF: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals? Thread-Index: Acrcpw4WXF25ZhMbTESp14+y2mptMAAENJ1w References: <4D95FB39404AA04CA998E7F63B1A2E5F0432C756@esealmw110.eemea.ericsson.se> <4BC7200F.3070208@telia.com> From: "Daniele Tincani" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Apr 2010 16:38:12.0106 (UTC) FILETIME=[09DE1EA0:01CADCBA] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: LF: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60134bc7413c7343 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Johan, Would a normal carbon resistor be quiet enough as a dummy antenna impedanc= e for this test? Cheers D. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@black= sheep.org] On Behalf Of Johan H. Bodin Sent: gioved=EC 15 aprile 2010 16.18 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals? Daniele, the ususal rule of thumb is that you don't need any preamplifier if you get a big increase in the noise level when the antenna is connected. It is best to make the comparison with a dummy load as "quiet reference" since some receivers may not show their true noise floor when the input is unterminated. The RX noise floor become unimportant if it is 10..20dB or so below the "natural" antenna noise. 73 Johan SM6LKM ---- Daniele Tincani wrote: > Hi LF, >=20 > =20 >=20 > Quite a general question: is a pre-amplifier needed in your opinion for > listening to LF weak signals (e.g. NDB DX, etc.)? >=20 > I read different opinions in very famous articles on the Web: one > opinion is that a bigger non-amplified loop is better than a smaller > amplified loop and an amplifier should be used only if really necessary > (and only with the strictly required gain). On the contrary, another > famous article says that an antenna pre-amplifier is important for NDB > DX, despite it mentions quite a big loop as the antenna. I'm just a > beginner in LF and NDB listening with quite a simple system. I tried an > homebrew amplifier together with my small loop and it seemed to me that > it did not add anything but loudness to both the signal and the noise. > Basically, no improvements in signal readability. What's your opinion, > in particular when cheap portables (e.g. DE1103) are involved? >=20 > =20 >=20 > Best regards >=20 > Daniele