Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.132]) by air-mb01.mail.aol.com (v128.3) with ESMTP id MAILINMB014-a1884bd44d5cb; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:10:36 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F1F83380000A2; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:10:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1O62WY-0000AY-RH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:09:30 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1O62WY-0000AO-EO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:09:30 +0100 Received: from mailout.toya.net.pl ([217.113.224.27] ident=postfix) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1O62WW-0006lh-FS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:09:30 +0100 Received: from mail.toya.net.pl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929F420000046 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:00:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (unknown [10.3.148.9]) (Authenticated sender: unimlyn) by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F3FA20000045 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:00:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4BD44B0B.8090208@toya.net.pl> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:00:43 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgTcWCeW5hcnNraQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003201cae3db$b7ffad50$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <4BD3F7BC.8010607@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.010 Subject: Re: LF: Fw: UNDERGROUND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40844bd44d5900d8 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Roger Lapthorn wrote: > The transmission was on 9.6kHz - some have asked if this was actually > legal in Poland - and not on 8.97kHz, although future tests there are > expected to be on this frequency. I too was a little surprised that > they did not make it known on this reflector. i also did not know either on or off the list.... :) 73, Piotr, sq7mpj qth: Lodz /jo91rs/ p.s. there is an official, government issued, document specyfing the use of particular frequencies in Poland ( its loose translation woud be: A national table of frequency assignments) frequencies below 9 khz are " not assigned" so it is the same as in majority of Reg.1 countries