Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.9]) by air-dd01.mail.aol.com (v128.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDD013-86574bbcbdd7f7; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:16:07 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 05117380000B2; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:16:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NzYqM-000677-28 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:15:10 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NzYqL-00066y-K5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:15:09 +0100 Received: from relay00.pair.com ([209.68.5.9]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NzYqI-0005Ce-SB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:15:09 +0100 Received: (qmail 65601 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 17:15:02 -0000 Received: from 64.206.3.50 (HELO ?192.168.1.103?) (64.206.3.50) by relay00.pair.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 17:15:02 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 64.206.3.50 Message-ID: <4BBCBEEB.7010706@charter.net> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:20:43 -0400 From: John Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4BB13167.3080404@telus.net>, <4BBA4F6A.9840.F1BA72@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>, <4BBACEA6.4060703@telus.net> <4BBCB626.30059.18824AC@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <004201cad674$7533cd40$6d01a8c0@DELL4> In-Reply-To: <004201cad674$7533cd40$6d01a8c0@DELL4> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60094bbcbdd51daa X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) One other constraint over here -- during the rare periods that CFH is running on 137.000, weak signal reception would be tough within +/- 300 Hz. John A. On 4/7/2010 1:04 PM, jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: > Mike > > Several hundred Hz separation between the W-E and E-W T/A windows would > be nice - the old 136.318 / 137.777 worked well. Since the EU stations > have abandoned 136.318 and moved to 137.777 it has been impossible to > receive them here in the northeast US due to local activity. This has > been pointed out over the past few years...to almost no avail. > > I'd suggest windows separation such that an average cw filter can > separate the two. Would sure be nice to get back to looking for EU > stations on 137 kHz! > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Dennison" > > To: > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 11:43 AM > Subject: Re: LF: VE7TIL Grabber and DCF39 Monitor back online > > >> Scott, >> >> I do not have direct experience of running a grabber, but it seems to >> me that your main difficulty is that, even with a SSB bandwidth on >> your LF receiver, you cannot cover DCF39 and the Eu DX window at the >> same time. >> >> The window at 136.318kHz was chosen to facilitate transatlantic tests >> and two-way QSOs so that the west-east traffic around 137.777kHz did >> not clash with east-west traffic. As I recall, there were QRM issues >> in Canada or the USA which meant that this was optimum. I do not know >> whether these are still relevant. >> >> I suggest an alternative west-east DX window just below the QRSS3 >> part of the band, ie around 137.650kHz. Provided this is not used for >> daytime transmissions when QRSS3 activity is expected, it should not >> cause QRM to other users. I would still suggest using the lower part >> of the band for skeds. >> >> This would enable you and others to add an Argo window that is within >> the receiver's passband, but avoids the need for Eu stations to QRM >> the 137.777 area in order to check reception on most grabbers. >> >> Does this help? >> >> What to other users of 137kHz think? >> >> Mike >> ==== >> >> >> >>> If you or anyone can assist me in getting the equipment or expertise >>> to get this setup I can commit to have it operational from a low noise >>> site for the next DX season. >>> >>> I just welcomed my first child within the last year to the world so >>> time is limited but my passion for LF is GREAT ;-) >>> >>> 73 Scott >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Mike Dennison wrote: >>> > OK, all understood. Thanks for considering the idea. >>> > >>> > 73 de Mike >>> > ======== >>> > >>> > >>> >> Unfortunately as the main LF RX is tuned to allow reception of the >>> >> upper end of the band 137778ish and DCF39 the EU DX window is not >>> >> within my passband. >>> >> >>> >> I hope to have a SDR online sometime in the future which would >>> >> resolve this. >>> >> >>> >> 73, >>> >> Scott >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Mike Dennison wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> This is good news, Scott. Is there any chance of one of your >>> >>> grabbers being tuned to the EU DX Tx window of 136.318kHz? >>> >>> >>> >>> Mike. G3XDV >>> >>> ========== >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm pleased to report the noise problem has been resolved and >>> >>>> most of the renovations here are complete. The 2200m grabber and >>> >>>> DCF39 monitor are back online. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> 73 Scott >>> >>>> VE7TIL >>> >>>> http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/ >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >