Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mj11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mj11.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.164.95]) by air-dd02.mail.aol.com (v128.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDD024-86aa4bbf8d5547; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:25:57 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mj11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CD92938000130; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:25:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1O0Kke-0000rV-HJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:24:28 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1O0Kkd-0000rC-Sn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:24:27 +0100 Received: from smtp815.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.244]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1O0Kkb-0001JJ-BA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:24:27 +0100 Received: (qmail 49141 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 20:24:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=ejH39lymbuJKuzsobn/2vegF6z1/P25aPATgTVyzp6T9Vw7AZ+K4NCUql/+gYoFMdsLjdXo2o4rf9mMW/zAIPZiQC5YUBRacCV7wEptlZkflVv1HXafm6TbWsYwiQBOZ8DQgEF1e3ecDuDHurXlHKQOUUueHtWj6JtZAEOw7b/c= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1270844659; bh=jzn3CtnIqVPu6nZHmAg7YkerxrV1JFmk5PW98Hxikhs=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=CAwPd5fbmkcHc1Nmj7emL74fxpgmohE5ICkZeCiQNJhQOGjCxCkyUyfXYD31qmquMu4Zwphsk17UBwi4SvbEyG8PeMxPm+NeWjydqDO+TX4muGOU3N1Izhrss6xixwy8TGmaWW8EFt5rM8axwud1sZV0Thu6zaXN+GLhRE8UM1I= Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@86.180.204.156 with login) by smtp815.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 09 Apr 2010 20:24:19 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- X-YMail-OSG: ZwCuSDEVM1kl76f2I2Ds2RYWAZHUR0Hso2hJG.hOfc0KgKaouCVB5DtuymfVmbqP1HTDHS_IrHoRzzq8cb4U2z0XDMv6LPc1IS6TFuYghFJcKmdLK9Jh.JY1pEdsRpU5aCkaugbhURBa_lcW4Tj9cDZffCrvxN8bOo_OJV1Y0XDSOuOO5IWjO1O9ToRyHUsGY9a_EEmVWhf1StNMeQ13WAidQ3bqbzw6quWnzmGHjkFqbNuSM1uQ6946wpVk6470 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <17A9542495DE4F9296878968B2D73B29@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <4BBE16CB.23244.11610C0@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>,<6876ACB6572F47BC801F2268111C7E07@JimPC> In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 21:24:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: QRSS limiter Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m264.1 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039400c89b64bbf8d5374f0 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Dear Rik, LF group, ...>what about IMD due to the non linear behavior of the clipping diodes ? Yes, some IMD is inherent in any clipping (or noise-blanking) scheme. If there is, for example, a strong local CW signal in the passband, "quieting" as in a FM limiting IF amplifier occurs, and any weaker signal present is heavily attenuated, and IM products generated. So severe cross-modulation of the weak signal by the strong one would be present. But where most of the power in the passband is more-or-less random noise like QRN, IM will still occur, but the products won't have any particularly defined frequency and will just add to the wideband noise level, or add noise sidebands to the signal being received. I suppose this is what causes the "thickening" of traces on the spectrogram. But overall, the reduction in noise obtained by clipping the large amplitude QRN impulses more than compensates for this. So the technique works quite well when you can only hear noise coming out of the RX speaker. The Spectrum Lab limiter seems to be less susceptible to these effects, I guess because the clipping threshold automatically tracks any signal present. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU