Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mi03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mi03.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.131.161]) by air-df07.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDF072-5efb4ba015281d9; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:32:56 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mi03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D1054380000A9; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:32:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NrgEt-0001Bk-VQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:31:55 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NrgEt-0001Bb-Kw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:31:55 +0000 Received: from mx.omskcity.com ([79.133.160.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NrgEq-0007rG-FQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:31:55 +0000 Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host209.161-133-79.sotline.ru [79.133.161.209]) by mx.omskcity.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o2GNVhAc022488 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:31:44 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA00318 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:26:13 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:26:12 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B63@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.8 (mx.omskcity.com [79.133.160.2]); Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:31:46 +0600 (OMST) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: AW: AW: LF: 8.97kHz antennas Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=koi8-r X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039400cdecb4ba015265114 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, [iso-8859-1] Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > Paul, if you wound a coil for me to resonate on 2 kHz, i will do it ;-) > But if i get the special permission for 300m we could test on 8,97 but= =20 > also on 5,18kHz (3*C =3D> f=3D8,97/sqrt3=3D5,18) To decrease frequency seems not good idea on my opinion. Noise decreases but radiation should decreases much more. This is intuitivelly but. Regards, Alexander