Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.130]) by air-md09.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINMD092-8b954b9e986d2c4; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:28:31 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6957A380000F0; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:28:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NrGsr-0007sb-D4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:27:29 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NrGsq-0007sS-Uy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:27:28 +0000 Received: from mx.omskcity.com ([79.133.160.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NrGso-0005op-4R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:27:28 +0000 Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host209.161-133-79.sotline.ru [79.133.161.209]) by mx.omskcity.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o2FKRLtY076815 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:27:22 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA00316 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:21:48 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:21:48 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <004d01cac479$9fefcbe0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.8 (mx.omskcity.com [79.133.160.2]); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:27:24 +0600 (OMST) X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40824b9e986c443e X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Such scepticist you are, Mal. Any data can be analysed. By the way frquency is some ID by itself. And certanly we are looking for more proof. On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, mal hamilton wrote: > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:56:38 -0000 > From: mal hamilton > Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... > > It is important for ID that the TX was keyed otherwise it could be any > carrier. Positive ID is needed otherwise the experiment is meaningless > de G3KEV > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Nicholson" > To: > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 7:45 PM > Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... > > > > Markus wrote: > > > He mentioned he had been attempting QRSS 10 for DF8ZR up > > > to about 16:30, > > > > The signal was strongest up to 15:00, very narrow bandwidth too. > > > > Then there was a gap until about 15:20 or so, when the signal > > came back weaker and with some spread until just after 16:00. > > > > It is important to know if the tx was CW or keyed during those > > times. > > > > -- > > Paul Nicholson > > -- > > > Regards, Alexander