Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.14]) by air-df07.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDF073-5efc4b968088267; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:08:24 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CD24C38000055; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:08:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Np2u2-0005oP-Om for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:07:30 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Np2u2-0005oG-Cm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:07:30 +0000 Received: from mx.omskcity.com ([79.133.160.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Np2u0-00046c-Ae for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:07:30 +0000 Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host209.161-133-79.sotline.ru [79.133.161.209]) by mx.omskcity.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o29H7O1t085747 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:07:25 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA00243 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:12:38 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:12:37 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4B9678C3.7070907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.8 (mx.omskcity.com [79.133.160.2]); Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:07:27 +0600 (OMST) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Possible VLF HV problems, or not? Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=koi8-r X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600e4b9680862d04 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, [ISO-8859-1] Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >=20 > I have had some thoughts about HV problems when operating a vertical=20 > antenna wire at some 10kV. Dear Stefan, there was no such a problem (seems to me) in Markus experiment with 10kV. May by with 20kV... But anyway corona protected rings (rather small i think) to be usefull on the ends of wire. Remember, high E is only arround ends of wire, not at the center of wire. Besides such a problems arises in 50 Hz systems at some about 100kV, not at 10 kV. 10 kV is rather small voltage:-) >=20 > Normally, e.g. in a 50Hz system there will flow a current into the air= =20 > (capacitive with a restistive component) due to the ionisation of the=20 > air when partial discharges occur. > This is due to exceeding the maximum E field strange on the wire (a=20 > function of its radius and geometry and insulation and the gap between= =20 > wire and insulation and the epsilon r of the insulation and and and ...= =20 > ;-) ). > In the special case of a VLF antenna there might be some special=20 > conditions that can limit the influence of the partial discharges. For= =20 > example, the Z (sqrt (L/C) of such an antenna is very high, so the=20 > resonance is quickly lost if C is changing slightly. The presence of=20 > partial discharges will apparently increase the C since the surface is= =20 > virtually increasing. There will be additional resistive losses but=20 > since a change the C will bring the circuit out of resonance (what would= =20 > reduce the voltage at the wire), there might be a limitation of the=20 > momentary value of the voltage. This will be anything else than a stable= =20 > process but there might be the effect, that the voltage will be limited= =20 > like with a varistor or a spark gap in series with a resistor. So,=20 > theoretically, there will be many harmonics and my signal might be=20 > better visible at its harmonics than on the ground wave ;-) So, have=20 > some of you, perhaps on LF, have experiences with theese effects?? >=20 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20 Regards, Alexander