Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mh08.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh08.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.220]) by air-mf02.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINMF023-8bcf4bb12bc8b0; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:38:01 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mh08.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EBC163800009D; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:37:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NwNZQ-0001su-VW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:36:32 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NwNZQ-0001sl-ID for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:36:32 +0100 Received: from smtp103.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com ([66.196.96.86]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NwNZN-0002bz-GX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:36:32 +0100 Received: (qmail 52725 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2010 22:36:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=snet.net; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Importance:X-MimeOLE; b=Axj6T2WxElq6A68Hu6Adm6kSVaza95W1sE1dE+7rAIMap1P/1qsEF77CKyMNej94ygUsP8mI7LUoSZkXuf42qCCPBVEVLWeX4FEw99ivkSPXMo18OVihkxk0CHlG9QdF+7I2thiebLFuqoQBDklL2qHX+614j8IoZDh/BKsFCzY= ; Received: from MAINDESK (paulc@76.192.4.59 with login) by smtp103.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2010 15:36:21 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: .XXmOBOswBCkuxW404eTLsnd.RdCQPge3WAF X-YMail-OSG: 36nvXIUVM1myy_I_nK3Z9Ammrm1jjEsIGrOn8Pr9dyCaDdP5KdXdx6UdcWUr6gZuNFz64QK.exEtU2icRFM1rEkm6E1lm5Sr1luRtksQMoyhE4aaexFccSChlgqRrq8CldEHlg8qZxyTXJa9VzG6eIEhuT8aqxmeVxgTufmzz.mqlncxp2RcM0o9DmWM7Q0eXIzZfXEPoVLtsAGCUT620xRQS0qjDHxwXIc1.wJICeZEhtN9VzUmggGpKqRAZnzRnQpyEQdR2UCYLwPwseLc8Dz99hhuiu953JIGY7B_5cvOBgHjxKBFZWwUicuPcYOtmydZyd9XI._eq1Iq.TJj82PVOsnnot3R3PvZuQyIcabwSVDY7kA5vBIMt5mOPl0AHsiJx1HgJVR4yzg6gWe3YRYOIf1OBmAAT_lVCB76Ag6d0U7xRwGXzqWWlSfzdvwzjlW32GP86aeT X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: "Paul A. Cianciolo" To: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:36:27 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <0F2B77385FC04A07A080811EE2E61079@JimPC> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=0.879,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: RE: Re: PF per Meter dependant on wire size? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60dc4bb12bc50747 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi Jim Thank you for the formula for calculating "C" of a wire. Also the information about adding additional wires is valuable. There are 2 methods I could try with my 55 meters of wire. With the use of fiberglass spreaders, multiple wires could be spread apart at the top of the tower forming a fan of the wires. With a single point on the shack end where the wires would all would combine. Probably better would be to support 4 wires equally spaced on a fiber glass poles 9 meters long on both the tower end and the shack end. This seems too easy Jim, there must be a point of diminishing returns. Knowing that the wire is 55 meters long, and 1 wire measures at 340 pf would you hazard a guess as to 4 wires 1 meter apart each the value of "C" Do you think 700 pf is achievable? Thank you for reading PaulC W1VLF -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of James Moritz Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 4:09 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: PF per Meter dependant on wire size? Dear Paul, LF Group, One formula for C per unit length: C = 24/Log(4H/d) picofarads/m , H= height, m, d = diameter, m So the capacitance depends on the logarithm of the ratio of height over wire diameter, which only varies a little for a large change in diameter, e.g for 1mm wire at 10m high = 5.2pF/m, 10mm diameter wire at 10m high 6.7pF/m. Actually this formula only applies to an infinitely long, uniform, horizontal, straight wire. In practice, the presence of ends, downleads, things on the ground, insulation on the wire, etc. etc. will all have an effect, and are difficult to calculate, so 6pF/m is usually as good an estimate as you are likely to get. Adding multiple wires will increase capacitance. If the wires are many metres apart (spacing large compared to height), you can multiply the capacitance by the number of wires. But usually, the wires are more closely spaced, and there is less increase in capacitance. The figures I have to hand are for two 1mm wires 100mm apart, C is higher by 39% compared to a single wire, 1m apart and C is 68% higher. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul A. Cianciolo" To: Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 8:24 PM Subject: LF: PF per Meter dependant on wire size? > Hello, > > I see from previous posts that a number of aprox 6 PF what size wire is > this for? > > Increasing wire size should in "C" as should several conductors in > parallel > spaced a few feet apart. > > PauLC > > W1VLF > > > >