Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mb10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mb10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.30]) by air-de02.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDE024-5ea94b9680fc2c5; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:10:20 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mb10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1E87638000141; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:10:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Np2vq-0005ui-Vs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:09:22 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Np2vq-0005uV-8G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:09:22 +0000 Received: from smtp6.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.190]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Np2vn-00049n-JZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:09:22 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3613.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4187D700008E for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:09:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3613.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3631E700008A for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:09:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.37.44]) by mwinf3613.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id C1C3C7000095 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:08:56 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20100309170856793.C1C3C7000095@mwinf3613.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <7B7DDEDF82F74ADB994E07375031DBE8@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <9afca2641003081438l4a7a3c42t43b7e35ebb6c5718@mail.gmail.com> <4B95ECEB.6050608@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <4B95ECEB.6050608@gmx.com> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:08:46 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100309-0, 09/03/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: VLF Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601e4b9680fb0a69 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 What about a 'HOT AIR' balloon ? G . -------------------------------------------------- From: "Mike.WE0H" Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:38 AM To: Subject: Re: LF: VLF > > Mal should get going on the band. He has lots of space for big antennas. A > 200' tall balloon or kite supported vertical with a kilowatt might > propagate a good distance. Where does a guy buy those balloon's? > > Mike > WE0H/8 > > > Roger L wrote: >> As a matter of interest, I wonder how many people in the UK have applied >> for a <9kHz NoVs so far since my note about OFCOM's willingness to >> seriously consider these a few weeks ago? I hope to submit my application >> this week. >> >> My best attempts and modest power levels are unlikely to result in much >> radiated power at all, but I'm following with great interest the German >> experiments by Marcus and others. There is little doubt that some records >> will tumble when they optimise their systems. Good luck. >> >> 73s >> Roger G3XBM > >