Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.201]) by air-dc07.mail.aol.com (v128.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDC074-86a54bb1bafa52; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:48:58 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A5B6B38000130; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:48:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NwX73-0006to-Rd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:47:53 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NwX73-0006tf-GA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:47:53 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NwX72-0005on-QF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:47:53 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2U8ljnB031638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:47:46 +0200 Received: from [129.206.29.99] (pc99.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.99]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id o2U8lp7q023150 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:47:51 +0200 Message-ID: <4BB1BB3F.7030005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:50:07 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: , <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1BB6@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <4BB0DC53.11486.1CDAEAC@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <4BB17B5A.5080907@telia.com> In-Reply-To: <4BB17B5A.5080907@telia.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60c94bb1baf83277 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Johan, You are right but first i think (and hope) there will come up other TX stations. Otherwise it would make no sense to discuss whats necessary for a 2 way QSO ;-) And 137kHz also started with the first transmitting station, HI ;-) One day, we can look back to our first VLF mails (that interested not only a few but many stns), starting in Februar 2010 with a smile and see what we have reached since that time, just like on LF :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC > Yes, of course. It important to remember that 9kHz is still "the lonely > dreamer's band". Pile-ups and other "traffic jams" are still quite rare > (!) so the risk of misreading a callsign is minimal. There are about > three million licenced radio amateurs on the regulated ham bands. On > 9kHz there is currently one (Stefan), and he has the privilege to choose > his own callsign, operating procedures etc. without breaking any law. > > 73 > Johan SM6LKM > >