Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de09.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.209]) by air-dc04.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDC043-86504ba8330135e; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:18:25 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-de09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 683B8380000A9; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:18:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ntuby-0007xW-Il for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:16:58 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ntuby-0007xN-0r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:16:58 +0000 Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ntubv-0002Ha-0k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:16:57 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2010 03:16:47 -0000 Received: from 75-168-150-7.mpls.qwest.net (EHLO [192.168.1.100]) [75.168.150.7] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us001) with SMTP; 22 Mar 2010 23:16:47 -0400 X-Authenticated: #60769621 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+/qUNASra/4We+VAcNxkMH5DDpRFd+dJNotYrSs/ FtwlXOLYXmuHNZ Message-ID: <4BA83247.1080505@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:15:19 -0500 From: "Mike.WE0H" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <2a2c8.24f60f40.38d54e4e@aol.com> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B81@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <4BA5CFAA.2030007@freenet.de> <56800827A5644E1BB3F320CB51E2300E@Black> <26E279AD762E44FB937A8A7DF8F934BC@Black> <8C7F2923D86B4517B1C156BA499E96E4@Black> , <29746320.1346347.1269244849281.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb078> <4BA7361F.1030702@abelian.org> <4BA7A586.8080307@abelian.org> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B87@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> In-Reply-To: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B87@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.54000000000000004 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: AW: LF: Re: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d14ba833007e89 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Lets say DX will be a reception from Mal. He is quite a long distance=20 from DK land. Have you tried regular CW and had people listen for the CW? Mike WE0H Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > Paul, the TX power was up to 300W and the current arround 530...570 mA,= so an optimal ERP of abt 2mW. The wind was strong and the kite at a high= angle for the most time! > =20 > Jim, M0BMU is the 2nd best DX distance! Jim, can you describe you RX det= ailed, pse. Or have i forgotten an older mail? What was the new /p QTH? An= d what are your observations about the change of QRM? > =20 > BTW: We could philosophize what is the definition for "DX" on LF and VLF= ! Or is there a standard definition? In my ham licence i learned that on= HF, DX is outside the own continent and on VHF it is above 300km. So, wha= t is it for LF? And what for VLF (by hams)?=20 > When we think about the effort and the average antenna systems available= we could call "DX" on VLF all that is beyond the near field, or say 10km,= that it sounds not too much unusual? What do you (all) think? > =20 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC