Return-Path: Received: from mtain-md06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-md06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.90]) by air-db09.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDB092-86234b8e4d391b2; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:51:21 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-md06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D9FAA38000086; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 06:51:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Nmn5h-0006Zt-9o for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:50:13 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Nmn5g-0006Zk-Ra for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:50:12 +0000 Received: from parrot.netcom.co.uk ([217.72.171.49]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nmn5e-0006F7-E3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:50:12 +0000 Received: from abelian.netcom.co.uk (i-194-106-52-83.freedom2surf.net [194.106.52.83]) by parrot.netcom.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C44328D3E for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:47:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abelian.netcom.co.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o23Bo3BS014529 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:50:03 GMT Message-ID: <4B8E4CEB.8070408@abelian.org> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:50:03 +0000 From: Paul Nicholson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4B8CE312.7090904@abelian.org> <20100302110052.BFCD8F3864@smtps02.kuleuven.be> <4B8D015B.10205@abelian.org> <4B8D5529.1060501@abelian.org> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B2C@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> In-Reply-To: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B2C@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: AW: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605a4b8e4d373783 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Roelof Bakker wrote: > I am looking for a simple way to detect the proposed test signals > at 8.970 kHz from Germany. 2 metre whip or wire, short wire connection to low noise JFET pre-amp, 10MOhm bias resistor, battery powered, ground resistance < 500 ohms, coax to house, transformer to break the ground loop. If possible the pre-amp should have enough gain to allow line input to be used, not the mic input. If preamp oscillates, lower the ground resistance. Test with Alpha sigs, make sure noise floor is natural VLF noise floor, not rx hiss or domestic digital mush. The floor should go up a few dB at night. To check rx noise floor, replace antenna with 20pF capacitor. Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > I know the LT1028 as the best audio op amp... Yes, given a low Z source - no good for E-field rx. > what is your locator or the locator where your Rx antenna is > placed? 53.703N 2.072W, I think that is IO83xq. Marked by the white cross in http://abelian.org/vlf/100105a.jpg > What do you recommend to those, who just receive with a wire in > the sound card? Maybe adequate if you are monitoring the strong MSK signals for SIDs but for natural radio, it is usually no-go. Easy to try so give it a go: check how Alpha is rxed and look for the natural noise floor bobbing up and down. Probably interference will be bad though because the rx ground =3D domestic/PC ground. > What are your experiences about the needed distance between > antenna wire and the house and what about hight above ground? For E-field, 10 or so metres from the house. A colleague in Sheffield obtains good results with a vertical rod in a suburban back garden. Height helps to get clear of interference but is not necessary just for signal voltage. Buildings, trees, walls, etc produce a shadowing effect so keep away from them if possible. If your neighbourhood power lines are above ground, you have a big problem. Avoid phone lines, fences, washing lines, other antennas, etc. Antenna base > 1 metre above long grass (static hiss as wind blows). > Is there principally the need for amplification or can it just be > reached by increasing the wire length? Out in the countryside, a long wire can work well with minimal amplification, it might only need some passive filtering to avoid intermod. Nearer civilisation, a short antenna carefully sited is better. With modern op-amps it isn't too hard to obtain an rx noise floor 20dB below the natural VLF floor at audio frequencies with just a 2m vertical antenna. The difficulty is finding an interference-free site and then making sure you don't bring any interference out to the rx along the cable. Usually E-field reception is easier than H-field. The mains hum is easier to filter because the E-field has fewer sidebands and the hum is more stable. For narrow band 9kHz that may not be an issue. > And what about a simple band pass filter to supress the 50Hz > and it's harmonics? Necessary or dispensable? If you're only receiving above 5 or 10kHz or so, you can ignore the hum providing it doesn't clip anywhere. But for lower frequencies an automatic notch filter that seeks out all the harmonics is essential unless you're really out in the wilds. At 9kHz hum should not be a problem, but digital gadget noise can be, eg the PC itself, PSU, USB leads, etc: transformer isolation essential. > Tnx for motivation ;-) Well, isn't this the most perfect kind of thing to inspire radio amateurs? It really hits the mark. The reason: it is just about feasible - but only just. If it were harder, you would not bother to try. If it was easier, well you would try but it would be not so rewarding - it would be just a formality, like ticking another country. No, this is just the perfect challenge for the constructor and operator. It can, just about, be done! The live spectrum of the band gives you something to shoot for - a nice long shot. -- Paul Nicholson --