Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.134]) by air-df01.mail.aol.com (v128.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDF014-5ee54bb1bc71103; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:55:13 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B01C9380001C4; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:55:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NwXD6-00070E-7U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:08 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NwXD5-000705-RO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:07 +0100 Received: from cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NwXD3-0005sr-HD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:07 +0100 Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374267B802A for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:53:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from PC_van_Rik.fys.kuleuven.be (dhcp-10-33-85-106.fys.kuleuven.be [10.33.85.106]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B2BF3862 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:53:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:53:58 +0200 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe In-Reply-To: <4BB1B7BB.1050708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <4BB1B7BB.1050708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20100330085352.16B2BF3862@smtps02.kuleuven.be> X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: PF per Meter dependant on wire size? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40864bb1bc6f0fe4 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Paul, Stefan, I you cannot put the coil at the top of the tower there is an alternative, see http://www.strobbe.eu/on7yd/136ant/#Tower 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T At 10:35 30/03/2010, you wrote: >Dear Paul, > >I have an idea. Take a photo of tower and the place where the coil will >be placed and add some red lines (e.g. with MS Paint) to illustrate the >wires. Then we can add some lines how we would do it :-) > >Can you use the tower itselt as the antenna? I mean, can you place the >coil on the tower and bring some wires down to earth, taking the HV? >That would be the effectivest way to radiate a signal since the most >current will flow in the cable between earth and the lower end of your >coil! It's like on LF, MF and HF, the effectiveness grows when the >loading coils are places as far as possible from the feeding point (e.g. >a short dipole or vertical). > >73, Stefan/DK7FC > > >Am 30.03.2010 00:36, schrieb Paul A. Cianciolo: > > Hi Jim > > > > Thank you for the formula for calculating "C" of a wire. > > Also the information about adding additional wires is valuable. > > > > There are 2 methods I could try with my 55 meters of wire. > > With the use of fiberglass spreaders, multiple wires could be spread apart > > at the top of the tower forming a fan of the wires. > > With a single point on the shack end where the wires would all would > > combine. > > > > Probably better would be to support 4 wires equally spaced on a fiber glass > > poles 9 meters long on both the tower end and the shack end. > > > > This seems too easy Jim, there must be a point of diminishing returns. > > > > Knowing that the wire is 55 meters long, and 1 wire measures at > 340 pf would > > you hazard a guess as to 4 wires 1 meter apart each the value of "C" > > > > Do you think 700 pf is achievable? > > > > Thank you for reading > > > > PaulC > > W1VLF > > > >