Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mg10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mg10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.210]) by air-di01.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDI011-eab64b9eca97326; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:02:31 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mg10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A24B738000097; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:02:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NrK9S-0000qF-SG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:56:50 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NrK9S-0000q6-Fz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:56:50 +0000 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NrK9P-00070P-Lb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:56:50 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqwIAO9lnktOkz2y/2dsb2JhbACHVZMbc7kghHsE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,646,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="286484303" Received: from unknown (HELO your91hoehfy9g) ([78.147.61.178]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2010 23:56:40 +0000 Message-ID: <002b01cac49b$2906ffe0$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:56:41 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d24b9eca9439b1 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Sri Om Frequency and some carrier is NOT PROOF also 120 sec dot is too slow for this type of experiment, with a kite erratic flight causing QSB and broken carrier. I need positive keyed ID to be convinced, there is no room for imagination. I wish Stefan good luck but no guesswork please. de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:21 PM Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... > Such scepticist you are, Mal. Any data can be analysed. By the way > frquency is some ID by itself. And certanly we are looking for more > proof. > > On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, mal hamilton wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:56:38 -0000 > > From: mal hamilton > > Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... > > > > It is important for ID that the TX was keyed otherwise it could be any > > carrier. Positive ID is needed otherwise the experiment is meaningless > > de G3KEV > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul Nicholson" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 7:45 PM > > Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... > > > > > > > Markus wrote: > > > > He mentioned he had been attempting QRSS 10 for DF8ZR up > > > > to about 16:30, > > > > > > The signal was strongest up to 15:00, very narrow bandwidth too. > > > > > > Then there was a gap until about 15:20 or so, when the signal > > > came back weaker and with some spread until just after 16:00. > > > > > > It is important to know if the tx was CW or keyed during those > > > times. > > > > > > -- > > > Paul Nicholson > > > -- > > > > > > > > Regards, > Alexander > > >