Return-Path: Received: from mtain-de12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-de12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.212]) by air-dc07.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDC073-86534bad24d71bd; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:19:19 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-de12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 42D0C380000A4; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:19:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NvGv2-0008Tm-Cq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:18:16 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NvGv2-0008Td-0S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:18:16 +0000 Received: from smtp820.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.249]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NvGuz-000143-5F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:18:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 96916 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2010 21:18:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=bU1AEvVEi/8L9MzgDs+SQuVpFd4jWE1E+n2ljmqmggtI2pD6w65imUE9SHOxWNyQZee21rhQ73x3H3Ypl2S+nqnxKH9Xha7W5Gl6mD+YXXFrWpBhdHrx5F4GLig8k2kq8N7hDQFsCnZrV8zfEDWb2n7ejogyz30Br2bxbt8j3v4= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1269638287; bh=QNKYNhGDwYS+SreS5YO59SxPEEcarRcE7Fm0/I9JGlc=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=QkX9vZfc/hT5yeVutgdNZDAopetjf28GCtbKT3BThB5zXB6Li4D74/Lu1k/eLLwtUxM7HT3NJNfjYKLZNA4qKmluGERQIoQ/XufVioe0XH8/flXbNipWUEacDACzjIBrmd4sWqGZYxoVuB+jcrjm3gc01neZMOtcx5RVTSaLhR0= Received: from lark (alan.melia@81.131.69.2 with login) by smtp820.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2010 21:18:06 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-YMail-OSG: 9si_uX8VM1lK6sa0uoLlt9hnrnwu9GUMTAtSM3SNnusaMYVwqd.uT6beM.uVCUsx0Jq1c3reBbAm.HUgbe5nI2bFRKSYETCgejTiPteQrBVWS5zJvnDyqkhwA85VHMUSdLqxthXI9yyOYPls2Xz.SvwHaGY3ujn6W8A1yFHOlswS3jJbRTQcYX5lbpNbWWYpbiW2RwyPHoBMOfA0RgGC92f6_ZFcITGt.jEhaHnyKHT2GJxzQVNJvvIXNEzkiz35MfawjcAbhqIiVNOc1nEi4Vy6oHVTqz9V X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <002501cacd29$da3eea70$0901a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <4BAD19D0.300@telia.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:48:31 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1983 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1983 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Question about ground impedance at 8.97 KHZ Stefan. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m262.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d44bad24d51b6f X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi Johan, an Impedance bridge measures the reactance and resistance is parallel I believe....doe sthat make a difference to what he is seeing?? Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johan H. Bodin" To: Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:32 PM Subject: Re: LF: Question about ground impedance at 8.97 KHZ Stefan. > Hi Paul, > > it sounds like your impedance bridge is measuring the absolute impedance > (that is Z = (R^2 + X^2)^0.5 where R is the real part, resistance, and X > is the imaginary part, reactance). R is probably a 10 to a few hundred > ohms, most of it is ground resistance - it can be neglected - the major > part of your impedance is the capacitive reactance of the antenna (Xc). > At 9 kHz, where C = 1/(2*Pi*9000*Xc), 70 kOhms means 253pF which is in > the ballpark for your 170' wire (about 5pF/m). > > 73 > Johan SM6LKM > > ---- > > Paul A. Cianciolo wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > Below is a quote from the Stefan's web page concerning his latest "Dreamers Band" DX contact Congratulations again Stefan. > >>From this information alone is it possible to calculate or know the antenna system impedance. > > > > > > > > > > "100m Vertical wire antenna, coil/antenna voltage was abt 15kV rms, average antenna current about 480mA, giving up to 1,7mW ERP. Applied power was up to 250W." > > > > Pertaining to the coil "Technical and mechanical data: L=553mH, Q=82, R(DC)=283 Ohm; 0,4mm diameter enameled copper wire, about 1200 turns! Average diameter 0,55m, height abt 0,5m. So, about 2000m wire! :-)" > > > > > > > > I have built a small impedance bridge that operates at 10 KHZ and shows my sloping 170' wire as 70K Ohms. I can also see approx 500 PF that can be nulled out using the bridge? > > > > Can the 70K value possibly be correct? (3) 6' ground rods about 6' apart are the ground... plus the electrical ground of the house. > > > > I am hoping to attempt a local transmission on 9KHZ > > > > Any information would be helpful. > > > > Thank you > > > > Paul > > > > W1VLF > > > > > > > > > > >