Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mc07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mc07.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.79]) by air-df03.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDF031-5eea4b85558d1e9; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:36:29 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mc07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E59DB3800009B; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:36:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NkKCd-0006Hc-7i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:35:11 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NkKCc-0006HT-RF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:35:10 +0000 Received: from cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NkKCa-0005ew-5Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:35:10 +0000 Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (smtpshost01.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.74]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F24F7B8047 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:35:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB-N2.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub-n2.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.12]) by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFF931E702 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:35:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be ([10.112.11.13]) by ICTS-S-HUB-N2.luna.kuleuven.be ([10.112.9.12]) with mapi; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:35:01 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:33:19 +0100 Thread-Topic: AW: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz_grounding systems Thread-Index: Acq1XqJg4CXyh+C9Tj2B2DDkRM4PYQACgv9IAAEY8GAAAIA5xA== Message-ID: References: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B13@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de>, ,<38F4A9873A5B474DB6FB337B1B69ABA12603EB2DBA@HERMES8.ds.leeds.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <38F4A9873A5B474DB6FB337B1B69ABA12603EB2DBA@HERMES8.ds.leeds.ac.uk> Accept-Language: nl-NL, nl-BE Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: nl-NL, nl-BE MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: RE: AW: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz_grounding systems Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604f4b8555817a67 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Chris, the values are measrued with antenna in resonance, so they are "ohmic". It is the sume of all kind of losses (soil, greenery, coil) and (almost ne= glectable) the radiation resistance. 73, Rik ON7YD ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.or= g] namens Chris Trayner [C.Trayner@leeds.ac.uk] Verzonden: woensdag 24 februari 2010 17:23 Aan: 'rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org' Onderwerp: RE: AW: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz_grounding systems Hi Rik and others, Thanks for your contribution. > if using a short vertical monopole antenna at 9kHz a ground loss of more= than 1000 Ohm seems quite realistic to me. "Ground loss" at my QTH: 500kHz =3D 35 Ohm 137kHz =3D 130 Ohm Do you mean resistance in the strict sense, i.e. the resistive component= of impedance; or in the rough sense, i.e. the ratio between voltage and= current, which is actually the modulus of impedance? I ask because there are capacitance and capacitance-like effects in the gr= ound. If you are looking at (in effect) a resistance in series with a capa= citance, that could explain the 1/f effect. Regards, Chris G4OKW PS - more details can be found in Keller, G.V. & Frishcknecht, F.C. / Elec= trical Methods in Geoprospecting / Pergamon (1966). See in particular chap= 1 - or probably skim it, as it is detailed and can get a bit boring. Pp.= 43-55 talk about these capacitive-like effects. The size of the 'capacita= nce' (capacitance, not its reactance!) even varies with frequency. If you= look at the graph on p.52 you may need to reach for a bottle of the stron= g stuff ;-) ----------------------- Dr Chris Trayner School of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom Tel: +44 113 34 32053 Fax: +44 113 34 32032