Return-Path: Received: from mtain-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.76]) by air-dc04.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDC041-86004b8679fd28a; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:24:13 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 97018380000C3; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:24:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NkdgE-000459-ON for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:23:02 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NkdgE-000450-Cl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:23:02 +0000 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NkdgC-0004wI-Ck for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:23:02 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2010 13:22:53 -0000 Received: from 188-194-84-187-dynip.superkabel.de (EHLO Uwe) [188.194.84.187] by mail.gmx.net (mp060) with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 14:22:53 +0100 X-Authenticated: #9373712 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/swyIiMDvstwXJ70aiYnJAgiUhMazT4NhZ1csemP 7LYwQ6gNzd7KHk Message-ID: From: "Uwe Wensauer" To: References: <001c01cab575$6bbb0460$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <20100225094846.EA85531E702@smtps01.kuleuven.be> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B19@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B1B@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:22:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.56000000000000005 X-Spam-Score: 3.4 (+++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK=3.36 Subject: LF: Re: VLF test signals? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404c4b8679fb433e X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Russisches Navigationssystem ALPHA Siehe auch SDR RX http://websdr.pa3weg.nl/ 73 Uwe, dk1kq ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" To: Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:58 PM Subject: LF: VLF test signals? Which commercial VLF transmitters can actually be received in the 10kH= z=20 range? There is much listed in the web but in times where these transm= itters=20 are shut down all this may be already old stuff. Who is receiving in= this=20 frequency region and can tell us a frequency and the SNR he is achievi= ng?=20 There are so many OMs who watch the VLF sector and have nothing done= with LF=20 and this group. Perhaps it it an idea to activate/motivate them for so= me=20 tests, to increase the RXers density. Maybe it is good to compare some RX rprts in that region. But i will= rather=20 be active at the transmitters front now ;-) Stefan/DK7FC