DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=MwHpMf04KaA3c4exVhvASgJ0h1TbE9Q+Z3CqTKMLLAQPrgQmFND7zMCFgxRfTFWY53
         +5aeqsjUr5P6M74bZNOx9UJIoWjIr2Cg7OrnQ9uJZuQrNFQ1zkghIqsKPVnkphPENLlC
         lEHSYLOaQPHfvyBNVPhlAvSoOa5YQhKTIW/cI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <000e01caaf04$cdfbed50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <000e01caaf04$cdfbed50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:36:41 +0000
Message-ID: <9afca2641002160636l75a94554p6f0696e153790f56@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: 500 more
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d0336846491047fb8a9c8
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--0015175d0336846491047fb8a9c8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Interesting thought Mal.

I wonder how OFCOM would react to a request for a larger UK allocation? I
wonder how many 500kHz NoVs have been allocated and how many people are
active.

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 16 February 2010 12:37, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:

>     With the recent influx of PA stations, new ones appearing every day,
> it might be the time to request a larger 500 band, 3 Khz is barely enough
> for QSO purposes, also a reduction in unattended  BEACON acty would be
> useful to avoid qrm.
> When acty increases and more countries permit 500 operations there will not
> be enough space.
> Receiver selectivity also needs to be checked, the old TRF sets will have
> to go.
> 73 de mal/g3kev
>
>
>



-- 

http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM
G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088

--0015175d0336846491047fb8a9c8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Interesting thought Mal. <br><br>I wonder how OFCOM would react to a reque=
st for a larger UK allocation? I wonder how many 500kHz NoVs have been all=
ocated and how many people are active.<br><br>73s<br>Roger G3XBM<br><br><b=
r>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 16 February 2010 12:37, mal hamilton <span=
 dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:g3kevmal@talktalk.net">g3kevmal@talktal=
k.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padd=
ing-left: 1ex;">






<div bgcolor=3D"#ffffff">
<div><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2">=A0=A0=A0With the recent influx of PA=
=20
stations, new ones appearing every day, it might be the time to request a=
 larger=20
500 band, 3 Khz is barely enough for QSO purposes, also a reduction in=20
unattended =A0BEACON=A0acty would be useful to avoid qrm.</font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2">When acty increases and more countrie=
s permit 500=20
operations there will not be enough space.</font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2">Receiver selectivity also needs to be=
 checked, the=20
old TRF sets will have to go.</font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2">73 de mal/g3kev</font></div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2"></font>=A0</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><br><a href=3D"http://=
g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/">http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/</a><br><a href=3D"=
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk">http://www.g3xbm.co.uk</a><br><a href=3D"http://ww=
w.youtube.com/user/G3XBM">http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM</a><br>
G3XBM =A0 =A0GQRP 1678 =A0 =A0 =A0ISWL G11088<br>

--0015175d0336846491047fb8a9c8--