Return-Path: Received: from mtain-df05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-df05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.217]) by air-mc02.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINMC023-a8d54b86c6e88c; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:52:24 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-df05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3BB583800007A; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:52:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NkinX-0006rO-0R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:50:55 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NkinW-0006rF-KG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:50:54 +0000 Received: from smtp818.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.247]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NkinU-0007lE-NR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:50:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 42596 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 18:50:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=XSu10rcnRd59mF8zgPzhK5mOS1NXrbdU8JY4gzSkxGVwa9Af6DHnFIdo22MYKMjcPu/mGiggwOZiAxGA04ZdX9sBxkytpDeUhnzb0Wxlsncu+iSfvsABptalUg8VAM/TnpbwXefK/hp4QDvCSuOfJBp5A3G2kGASpC0fjRA9H7c= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1267123847; bh=9qzFig0WAgiWoY1+TgeVsGjn15ZbClMqsTzgHKB5k3Q=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=mvBnQaagfXPPPlf+VdYN2A4h4tSe9fWISf0GITNQLFEDmimknEPEpCyLZsed6E/7gtxcMJl3rD3XRdyw1wcpGN0fI0MZyGJd9TZgazibXRRvMDvRAu+AA2Y/3BLn5zrTEDvjfEDN25RZqTj9SpwkN2ApQCzB0LwBxwB1jdDfAR4= Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@86.180.204.156 with login) by smtp818.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 18:50:46 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- X-YMail-OSG: UiZGa04VM1mFKudL6PL3SDDXH2.yl.Dy2577si8v8mHtPSTQlU_Fas.AE1Q74etVD5zb2JnufgeQJvlINQ5UdH8J4jiogZq9oC7qLXD5zYqOOMMjM_r0Hyv4ExCD5sVj.KZKZ7QCz0KyWv1lSbYirWa2f9UKshGffvMv4FNJocsFmDnLDv7E17L0EnR5xxAqtWiaGYveg6qM4LCpjGJBjSxZscOJD9crwwOrurFGVADPoJlqV6j.gOnWRajmybDFpf8.b0YkU1J9br68SnRkfw1CkAi7KyMx0lWBL4Jl X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <70718ADC6A924E2F9BA6C5F1294DAD14@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B18@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:50:46 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d224.2 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d94b86c6e7397d X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Dear LF Group, As a quick experiment to estimate noise level at 9kHz, I coupled a sig gen into my broadband RX loop antenna using a "current transformer in reverse" arrangement to induce a known EMF into the loop. I used Spectrum Lab to monitor the RX output, set up for QRSS3 reception (0.46Hz noise bandwidth). I reduced the signal level to give what I imagine would be an "M" copy trace, and from the induced EMF and loop area worked out the equivalent field strength - this was 35uV/m. It is a bit difficult to say what the SNR is, due to the constantly varying impulsive noise, but 6dB is probably not a million miles from the mark, which would imply a noise field strength about 25uV/m per sqrtHz. I don't know if the noise level on VLF this evening is particularly high or low. The Alpha beacons are clearly audible here. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Talbot" To: Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:22 AM Subject: Re: LF: AW: 9 Dreamers > To get the V/m value from this, first calculate the effective area of a > 9kHz > isotropic antenna : > At 9kHz, lambda = 33333m, G = 4.pi.A/lambda^2, G = 1, so A = > 88*10^6 m^2 > > 1mW of noise per Hz bandwidth, received in this aperture means noise > density > Nd = is 1.1E-11 W/m^2 > Field strength E volts/metre, == SQRT(Nd. 377) > = 65uV/m in 1 Hz bandwidth, or 65uV/ (ROOT Hz) >