Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mi03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mi03.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.131.161]) by air-mc06.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINMC064-a9764b743d17217; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:23:35 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mi03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 278DA380000FD; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:23:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NfckJ-0000dn-OE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:22:31 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NfckJ-0000de-Bn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:22:31 +0000 Received: from smtp822.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.18]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NfckH-0003hD-BL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:22:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 23690 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2010 17:22:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=Dd386IXnkn0DRRlFHgVffAoco8wPt1y66UrnTkc7MergHxp3VqEuhRoykoyfvg5z5x/Q1wLWPtw71AAq4A51uHJee2NPfsWsY2KgRaYPhcEG5+NX/vhoHmlrDpnO/GkMLCCSwv47/OVldOH216XL1IFrv0ASQAk1r8Mm/l54ghM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO DennisPC) (dennis.easterling@86.154.67.245 with login) by smtp822.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2010 17:22:22 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: H_MJu2qswBDkdHeCAZfwexko6VNOiMP5URzYEvz3WrE5v1grQm6fnvJecjM9 X-YMail-OSG: DKbonYEVM1mhl.x_2kAT0GgJCDoBWgN5lLqsQPDtL0C3zqIy.yb7ekP7bXxVdBbN0OUvvY_UVQ4K3q2zf4gsONVaC_0Ih7WRSm1nYzSRdATrYcvtoXYa7_oPoGeZ7LJcKnQmHLQxUuKuWC8gi6XjzQWd86oNkilSk0dS27cQMyT.6UhWWac4qmgoV.q0YrS9OaCxjquMdfSYxVZ4C2UmvIqdTsZz0OfPYs9IsZbPkVk- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <271B228171C74444945F7FAF718CEC06@DennisPC> From: "DENNIS EASTERLING" To: Cc: "Peter M0FMT" References: <9e6eddd01002110702u6f7c74eel1296a92bbf9405ce@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9e6eddd01002110702u6f7c74eel1296a92bbf9405ce@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:22:17 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: New NoV Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039400cdecb4b743d1603ab X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi Dominic Congrats. on getting your NOV for 600m. I understand that you have been receiving OK, if so you are halfway there as the sigs are so weak compared with noise. I use various loops and a PA0RDT mini-whip for receiving. The latter seems to be the best all round solution for me. My TX antenna is a 'T' type 10m vertical (though zig-zags a bit before entering the shack) with a 19.5m top (longest I can get in my garden). Using a GW3EUP tx running just over 20w, I can qso Finbar in Derry Ireland, and have been reported by a German listener in Cuxhaven. 73 Dennis M0JXM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dominic Baines" To: "rsgb lf group" Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 3:02 PM Subject: LF: New NoV > Hi all, > > I just RX my SRP/NoV for 501-504kHz. > Hope to have my station up and running for TX as soon as possible. > Thanks for all those who since 2008 have so far had a cross band qso > perhaps we can manage a qso on 500kHz now. > Will focus on CW initially. > > 72 > > Dom > M1KTA >