Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd09.mx.aol.com (rly-dd09.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.156]) by air-dd03.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDD031-b974b4bafb87f; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:09:55 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd09.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD091-b974b4bafb87f; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:09:47 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NUTNW-0006kZ-22 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:08:54 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NUTNV-0006kQ-Ja for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:08:53 +0000 Received: from imr-mb01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.164]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NUTNT-0004zF-LZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:08:53 +0000 Received: from imo-da03.mx.aol.com (imo-da03.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.201]) by imr-mb01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o0BN8ZjO001912 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:08:35 -0500 Received: from G4gvw@aol.com by imo-da03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id l.c49.53c9a403 (43914) for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:08:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.68] ([92.18.91.54]) by cia-dc08.mx.aol.com (v127.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIADC083-ab8a4b4baf6cbd; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:08:29 -0500 From: g4gvw To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <005e01ca92dc$a83d23c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> References: <000e01ca9223$6d16ec90$0517aac0@desktop> <9afca2641001101102r6252b153lf6d911ee622589e5@mail.gmail.com> <004101ca922b$214cf0e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <9afca2641001101153u288ebc3dh81ba03efc09b650@mail.gmail.com> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1A8E@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <002701ca92a7$306cf080$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <20100111120918.29c48e1d@opc1> <1263222973.15328.20.camel@pat-compaq-evo> <005e01ca92dc$a83d23c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:08:28 +0000 Message-Id: <1263251308.32568.30.camel@pat-compaq-evo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: G4gvw@aol.com X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW... Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Oh dear Mal! I'm afraid I must, therefore, admit to being a British citizen living in the country of my birth and consequently subject to ITS laws and regulations. I also have to accept that in practical terms there is a political influence at work in the legislature of any country with a legal or regulatory system. As to my own LF achievements, my greatest occured many years ago (approx. 50) when I used a little glass encapsulated device together with a toilet roll centre and some wire salvaged from an old transformer and a couple of bits from an old radio to generate enough volts across an old government-surplus headset to receive something called "The Light Programme" from the BBC. I didn't even know about something called LF or MF. At the age of approximately 11 years that feeling of achievement was so mind-blowing that nothing I have done in radio ever since has ever surpassed it so I now take a lot of impressing and multiple DXCC on every frequency from DC to Light just doesn't cut it anymore as an end in itself. You see that achievement all those years ago was born out of ignorance - I no longer have that excuse! On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 16:39 +0000, mal hamilton wrote: > That was a political decision, the GPO, BBC and others were afraid a mere > radio amateur might get ahead of them at the time. The same criteria did not > apply in other countries like the USA and others worldwide. > G3KEV > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "g4gvw" > To: > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:16 PM > Subject: Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW... > > > > This discussion seems a bit pointless and is not getting anyone > > anywhere. After all, the original AA (Artificial Aerial) licences from > > which the modern licence (and by default its ethos) derives was intended > > to allow the experimenter to generate Rf with a prohibition on any > > effective radiation. > > One might also consider the definition of "message" - the presence or > > otherwise of a carrier of whatever duration or amplitude might be > > considered a "message"! > > If you really want to be pedantic, were I not to be an amateur radio > > licence holder, would I be permitted to listen to those stations who > > have notices of variation etc. From where I'm sitting I cannot determine > > whether or not they are "authorised" from the point of view of a > > listener under the regulations. > > My licence does not appear to require me to transmit anything at any > > time. It simply (or with complications) sets out terms and conditions to > > which I am expected to adhere when I do radiate RF. > > I am getting very concerned that somewhere "out there" is a strange and > > mythical figure called "The Perfect Radio Amateur". > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 12:36 +0000, David Pratt wrote: > > > In a recent message, John P-G wrote ... > > > > > > > >Where is the requirement to pass any message whatsoever? > > > > > > Clause 1(1)(a) of the Terms, conditions and limitations of your Licence: > > > > > > The Licensee shall ensure that the Radio Equipment is only used: > > > for the purpose of self-training in radio communication, including > > > conducting technical investigations.... > > > > > > The SRP does not replace the Amateur Radio Licence; it is merely an > > > addition to it. > > > > > > To me, radio communication means passing messages. > > > > > > 73 > > > > > > David G4DMP > > > > > -- > > 73 es gd dx de pat g4gvw > > qth nr felixstowe uk > > (east coast, county of suffolk) > > > > > > -- 73 es gd dx de pat g4gvw qth nr felixstowe uk (east coast, county of suffolk)