Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dh12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dh12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.32]) by air-di08.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDI081-eb664b4ad84ba1; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:50:35 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dh12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BCBEF3800008C; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:50:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NUF1Y-0008Pq-3i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:49:16 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NUF1X-0008Ph-IT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:49:15 +0000 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NUF1V-0007by-Pp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:49:15 +0000 Received: from know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.1]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20100111074907.BELM17277.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:49:07 +0000 Received: from [86.26.81.210] (helo=desktop) by know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NUF1P-0001Zp-NI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:49:07 +0000 From: "James Cowburn" To: References: <000e01ca9223$6d16ec90$0517aac0@desktop> <74FCFE8B23464B2DB8B5DF8D351877BD@JimPC> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:49:02 -0000 Message-ID: <009901ca9292$8af59030$0517aac0@desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <74FCFE8B23464B2DB8B5DF8D351877BD@JimPC> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 Thread-Index: AcqSQEXLqiwFjgurTG+b8vaV/qFWsQAUfU/Q X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=W3tOLUehizD4qj6VhtReFuw5MKb8d+XqjIxlDsIazEA= c=1 sm=0 a=4l1WGFfXCcEA:10 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=8RloEfZUAAAA:8 a=QHmaMqTK01RwgcQgm2kA:9 a=mpr5X5t6H6isbUhHlKAA:7 a=nKFS9-LMFsN0FTqmjXt92G9DWQwA:4 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=O58u2wXj750A:10 a=dzLfvetyajkGp6hO:21 a=T4ciHTu6PHiYiQQS:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: RE: Re: Link budget calculation or estimation of dist for given power on WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41204b4ad8493a8e X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Dear LF, Thanks to all for the informative answers. It's a bit like working with Pharmaceutical Regulators whose stock answer is "it depends"!! Seriously thanks loads With best regards Jim Dr. James Cowburn -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of James Moritz Sent: 10 January 2010 21:59 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: Link budget calculation or estimation of dist for given power on WSPR Dear Jim, LF Group, The main variables involved are: TX ERP TX directional pattern (probably only if a TX loop is used) Distance - leading to "geometric" propagation losses Other propagation losses - for DX signals, basically due to ionospheric effects Band noise level at the receiver Directional patttern of RX antenna Received SNR required for mode in use It is difficult to make a direct calculation because some of these are not known to any great level of confidence - in particular, the "other" ionospheric propagation losses, and the band noise level at a particular receiver. Noise levels can be determined by field strength measurements, although few people have done this - my best estimate at M0BMU is about 3uV/m in 2.5kHz bandwidth under quiet conditions, although obviously varying with time of day, band conditions, direction etc. There does not seem to be much info available for ionospheric losses at LF/MF - this is of course part of the motivation for using modes such as WSPR to probe propagation. But you can be sure that simply extrapolating results with closer stations to long distances won't give a reliable answer - there is no simple relation between loss and distance. But on a practical level, you can use the WSPR database to get a fairly good idea of how much TX ERP you need to be received by particular stations, e.g. WD2XSH/17 has spotted M0BMU 40 times during the past week, with SNR between -31dB and -16dB, but quite frequently around -25dB . G7NKS is a similar distance and path, so the same ERP (estimated at 2W for M0BMU) should give similar results. If you would be content with rather fewer spots at around -30dB, close to the minimum for WSPR, you could reduce the ERP by about 5dB, or perhaps even 10dB reduction (200mW) if you would be happy with just the odd 1 or 2 spots at peaks in the propagation - this is the kind of level G4JNT is running, and has indeed been spotted a couple of times at WD2XSH/17. You could do a similar kind of estimate with other stations, of course. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Cowburn" To: Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 6:33 PM Subject: LF: Link budget calculation or estimation of dist for given power on WSPR > Dear LF, > > Has anyone any ideas or suggestions on a resource for calculation of a > link > budget for WSPR over a set distance?