Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd10.mx.aol.com (rly-dd10.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.157]) by air-dd05.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDD054-ba54b4b363b3a5; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:31:40 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd10.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD107-ba54b4b363b3a5; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:31:26 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NULHk-0002Vj-IH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:30:24 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NULHk-0002VZ-4V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:30:24 +0000 Received: from out1.ip08ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.244]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NULHi-0001fb-Dy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:30:24 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAE3ESktZ8qx8/2dsb2JhbADWcoQvBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,256,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="430696232" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([89.242.172.124]) by out1.ip08ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 11 Jan 2010 14:30:16 +0000 Message-ID: <003b01ca92ca$97eed020$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <000e01ca9223$6d16ec90$0517aac0@desktop><9afca2641001101102r6252b153lf6d911ee622589e5@mail.gmail.com><004101ca922b$214cf0e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><9afca2641001101153u288ebc3dh81ba03efc09b650@mail.gmail.com><38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1A8E@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de><002701ca92a7$306cf080$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g><20100111120918.29c48e1d@opc1> <20100111141623.0d41fa7f@opc1> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:30:15 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Another script for EPISODE 2 of Dr WHO ???? Coming soon to a WSPR screen near you?? g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "John P-G" To: Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:16 PM Subject: Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW... > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:36:32 +0000 > David Pratt wrote: > > > In a recent message, John P-G > > wrote ... > > > > > >Where is the requirement to pass any message whatsoever? > > > > Clause 1(1)(a) of the Terms, conditions and limitations of your > > Licence: > > > > The Licensee shall ensure that the Radio Equipment is only used: > > for the purpose of self-training in radio communication, including > > conducting technical investigations.... > > > Self-training = learning something, by your own endeavours > > Radio Communications = the whole gamut of science & engineering involved > in generating, radiating, receiving and detecting signals at radio > frequencies. > > Where does it prescribe that one must pass 2-way messages in real time > to undertake this "self-training"? > > If I decide to spend some time studying how "radio communications" > might be affected by variations in propagation conditions then why > shouldn't I collaborate with other like minded operators and pool our > resources and results. > > If at another time I decide to study how "radio communications" might > be affected by different receiving system architectures why should I > have to rely on "2-way real time message passing" to quantify my > results if I can obtain (to me) more useful and interesting results in > another way. > > Perhaps another open-minded experimenter is willing to generate some > signals for me to study? Perhaps a widely spaced group of them would > be willing to participate? > > Perhaps later the other operator might want to follow his own > investigation into transmitting antenna design, and I might act as a > remote measurement facility. > > The knowledge gained into "radio communication" is personal to each > operator - you might get nothing from my own recent investigations into > "remote HF station control and operation over the internet", and I might > get nothing from your chat with someone on 80m CW, or your 599TU > report from Aruba on 40m in a contest. > > If you gain some new insight into an aspect "radio communication" > having 2-way, real-time communications - then great, no-one is > stopping you. > > If I gain some insight into an area of "radio communication" from a > system like WSPR - then to me that's also "self-training in radio > communication". > > Only a continuous, unmodulated carrier conveys no information (beyond > its frequency), so all the methods currently being discussed (QRSS, > CW, DFCW, Hell, PSK - yes even WSPR) are forms of information > transmission i.e. "message passing" - and thus would fit your reading of > "self-training in radio communication". > > Now, let's all just get on and play radio.... > > > John > GM4SLV > >