Return-Path: Received: from rly-me06.mx.aol.com (rly-me06.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.40]) by air-me10.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINME101-9c04b22448a2cd; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:09:46 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me06.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME064-9c04b22448a2cd; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:09:32 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NJ5EK-0006vi-A6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:08:20 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NJ5EJ-0006vZ-SQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:08:19 +0000 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NJ5EH-0008ID-SX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:08:19 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so445668fga.10 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:08:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=K4kBWSLEjMXWd+wMyFjiStxPlpaw96hyI8vFYc1Lhps=; b=UMH0QNuQaDG56puMX8KMkC+mjgYMRaypV7/e3FF3hDw/uXJqIdzCOsox0YS2rz5awr 5KC24xpJoy5+Sr7SRojlqu8v9troy6prv7Oz/UmZcQBh6uX5QYZfCkv60ec9JaAIN+Zs zOtrHVdwVVrHKtsS+ii3AGupojDDH7Yuxi88Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bFKdQpfNHNDJMhjDSl1wJ3fOQpan5RWMcoy0Y85cxIJjZz3xoCfbH5Nt8GNB/TddMt /kpLjk/JxXaKNbuL/gH/i4cD0EjfCXm83R7zleLgajZfOKsJjOUjalriVhbq5hBFPk4c 8f6wY+R2h0ezGiGfNGttIxdLIOWeFhUhu99Sk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.141.159 with SMTP id c31mr145102hba.147.1260536896881; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:08:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AC12@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <1260444821.6353.65.camel@vaio3rd> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AC12@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:08:16 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d253.1 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) 10.LOG(10/3) =3D 5dB and 10.LOG(30/3) =3D 10dB Andy www.g4jnt.com This email has been scanned for damaging side-effects by the health and safety police 2009/12/11 Stefan Sch=E4fer : > Dear LF, > Does anybody know about the "gain" between QRSS3 and QRSS10 or QRSS30?= I mean, if the noise in both cases is equal, how much can I reduce my tx= pwr when switching from qrss3 to qrss10? Or isn't it possible to give suc= h a relation? > And: Was there ever a TA QSO in QRSS3? > I am new on the reflector, sri ;-) > > Stefan / DK7FC > >