Return-Path: Received: from rly-db10.mx.aol.com (rly-db10.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.85]) by air-db08.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDB082-af24b1d9b9630e; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:19:56 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db10.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB108-af24b1d9b9630e; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:19:36 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NHnmT-0004Da-K2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:18:17 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NHnmT-0004DR-3m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:18:17 +0000 Received: from web86505.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.130]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NHnmR-0003EB-0d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:18:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 98726 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Dec 2009 00:18:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1260231489; bh=ULtw6DdDg4vY7M00JMEkyISKF7oPPYH6p7FsMp/SsU8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AYHXCMie23UPt0vToQBntsIk/qmJijx3y5SnBaGKVRcDKF95lu88f1pmgCfj8eiNNwwzlKdMYx/ZwtQPwc8d0UmH/T27AuU0Cxu0rwwPPOfgauFulQ8qw7fwR3JSjhriAOGAgWNwoIt8jX4rHN2it55tSxccPNsR/sRv2k9vd5E= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=q8J/LtB73/ARg1FFxpMg9OxUd3oY1HH7mg7FYYI2hvhiVgDABA9bWilFaGpdwOiM53Tt5MSsYQyS+Ki5EZkR54uZxiWOVrS9dlbrtNnX3wANOvvA36mkyGBlWzoYTnFO5plX7CR2VSwXoWOWUdLzm8f0HqqOtgga6iIwNFM6eO8=; Message-ID: <702134.97980.qm@web86505.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: .zkhFVAVM1nWNWQKwgiiDh3NKVlBK2jmNWKo0y.lbUtu468zbuG1BxioEC6uq0chYk.DDohcHOgj8ttbu7AcccRcOWyhzHo4QQHzomdg8GwFotDrfc5Bl31iL1Mi.CxmZQ1A_QHCQybIiwT26zrx1YD5xDV2H1NGYhRBWiUuCAZ_zIjCfNLoMeVi_CgWxgOaj92G3hY9roPQ6KZLbZCmtB_OuBqWy7MD_5hufNQHIe6k3abIsibQmJt.ofOYTVkaBY6ZDbcw0SUF4ZefTk7woX_vHP8iNYZ.wZksl5G9nz85lcMe6q08C9xnljsXfEba6sMrlbIkRdspZzQpwfxZK7bMFquNuN9mvrs- Received: from [81.131.7.186] by web86505.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:18:09 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:18:09 +0000 (GMT) From: ALAN MELIA To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Broadcast audio splatter on 136kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d299.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass Hi Jacek, do you have experience of this effect at LF?? It is well known= at HF/VHF where it is more likely that metalwork will be near resonant le= ngths, and stations causing the problem are close to hand. You need a sign= ificant induced current (hence the need for near resonance) to radiate a= strong enough signal from an inefficient mixer like that.=20 It is obviously a contender but I tend to question anyone who may be "extr= apolating HF ideas" into this part of the spectrum for practical examples,= because otherwise this is how the "urban myths" arise. After 15 years of= interest in LF I have never come across a case that I could be sure was= that particular cause but I do not live close to very high power stations= .....I have BBC World service Orfordness is about 25 km away (1296kHz and= 646kHz I believe) 250kW and I have a local MW BC station (1250ish) runnin= g about 1kW about 2km away. The effects I have heard have aways come down= to ICM. and have never involved those local frequencies. Markus DF6NM has done considerable investigation on similar things and in= general I think he finds the problems like this emanate from the transmit= ter site so are generally head over a wider area independent of direction. Best Wishes Alan G3NYK --- On Mon, 7/12/09, Jacek Lipkowski wrote: > From: Jacek Lipkowski > Subject: Re: LF: Broadcast audio splatter on 136kHz > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Monday, 7 December, 2009, 21:09 > On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Paul-Henrik > wrote: >=20 > > [...] Luxembourg effect, transmitter IMD or just me > missing the point? >=20 > maybe just mixing by some rusty junction? (long rusty fence > or something similar) does the imd vary when the weather is > dry, and suddenly rain falls? >=20 > jacek >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20