Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd05.mx.aol.com (rly-dd05.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.152]) by air-dd04.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDD041-b794b179cf145; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:12:03 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd05.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD053-b794b179cf145; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:11:46 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NG9aC-0001CD-LP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:10:48 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NG9aC-0001C4-41 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:10:48 +0000 Received: from smarthost3.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.13]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NG9aA-0003x2-PI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:10:48 +0000 Received: from bb-87-82-0-148.ukonline.co.uk ([87.82.0.148] helo=[192.168.0.3]) by smarthost3.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NG9aA-0009Bg-Bt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:10:46 +0000 Message-ID: <4B179D08.3030706@ukonline.co.uk> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:12:08 +0000 From: Peter Dodd User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AAF4@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <1259777260.4b16acec27aa8@imp.netikka.net> In-Reply-To: <1259777260.4b16acec27aa8@imp.netikka.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: LF, reducing common-mode noise Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) A couple of weeks ago I asked how can one measure the mu of ferrite rings. I received very good information via this reflector for which I would like to thank those who contributed. I was experimenting with various common-mode chokes, particularly on how to measure their characteristics using the AIM 4170. I was advised that the capacitance of the measuring setup might make the measurements invalid. I introduced various values of capacitance to measure these effects and by extrapolation concluded that my measurement method was acceptable. Inserting large values of capacitance across the common mode choke destroyed its characteristic as a choke and turned it into a selective tuned circuit. This arrangement appears to reduce common-mode noise at the frequency to which it is tuned but is only effective at that frequency. The main advantage is that you don't need such large values of inductance. Regards Peter, G3LDO Paul-Henrik wrote: > Hello Stefan, LF > > I can not overemphasize the possible need to keep the feedline "clean" and free > of RFI that may otherwise make it's way to any active whip antenna. > > My first attempts at deploying the PA0RDT Mini-Whip here were unsuccessful and > disappointing due to the fact that some of the RFI I tried to avoid was > conducted from the shack out to the antenna along the coax. This may among > other things depend on what kind of radio the antenna is connected to. > > If in doubt, my advice is to use one common mode choke where the coax leaves the > house and to ground the coax braid just behind it using an independent > earth-stake and then further a second common-mode choke just before the > feedline goes vertically up to the antenna. > > For common mode chokes I use large high-mu ferrite rings that can take 20 turns > of RG-58 or up to 45 turns of RG-174 but smaller rings can be used with RG-174. > There is a picture here of the first test-choke I used for tracking down my > noise: http://peditio.net/utility/Attachments/choke_sml.jpg > > This may be "overkill" in most installations but I'm sure some users can gain > from these extra measures just as I did. > > > > BR > > Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ > > > > >